The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation
Abstract
In-vitro fertilization is associated with a high rate of multiple pregnancies, a consequence of the number of embryos transferred. There is a challenge in avoiding even twin pregnancies in assisted reproduction, and this can be accomplished with elective single embryo transfer and a good cryopreservation programme. In our follow-up study, we analysed all our elective single embryo transfers during 1998-1999. In all these cycles at least one embryo was frozen. A total of 127 elective single embryo transfers were performed with a clinical pregnancy rate of 38.6%. The highest implantation rate was obtained with four-cell embryos with <10% fragmentation (39.8%). Thirty-four patients have delivered (26.8%), one of these being a monozygotic pregnancy. In total 129 frozen-thawed cycles have been achieved in 83 patients. One frozen-thawed embryo has been transferred in 46 cycles with a clinical pregnancy rate of 17.4%, and two embryos have been transferred in 83 cycles, with a clinical pregnancy rate of 37.3%. Up until now, 66 of 125 patients in our single embryo transfer programme have delivered or have on-going pregnancies, and 77 still have embryos frozen. The cumulative delivery rate per oocyte retrieval is 52.8% and the twin rate 7.6%. We conclude that elective single embryo transfer with a good cryopreservation programme results in very acceptable pregnancy rates with a low risk of twins. This is a cost-effective practice that substantially reduces all risks associated with multiple pregnancies and lowers the cost per delivery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries
Ombelet, W., Cooke, I., Dyer, S., Serour, G., & Devroey, P. (2008) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn042 · Cited by 720
Why do couples discontinue in vitro fertilization treatment? a cohort study
Olivius, C., Friden, B., Borg, G., & Bergh, C. (2004) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.029 · Cited by 377
De Geyter, C., Wyns, C., Calhaz-Jorge, C., de Mouzon, J., Ferraretti, A. P., Kupka, M., Nyboe Andersen, A., Nygren, K. G., & Goossens, V (2020) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deaa250 · Cited by 195
Affordable IVF for developing countries
Ombelet, W., & Campo, R. (2007) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60337-9 · Cited by 107
van de Vijver, A., Polyzos, N. P., Van Landuyt, L., Mackens, S., Stoop, D., Camus, M., De Vos, M., Tournaye, H., & Blockeel, C. (2016) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dew045 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Tiitinen, A.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-06-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1140-1144
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2106630628
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/16.6.1140
- The paper
- Tiitinen, A. (2001). Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.6.1140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.