Cited by 66Reproductive Biology and FertilityAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyReproductive Health and Technologies

What is the optimal duration of progesterone administration before transferring a vitrified-warmed cleavage stage embryo? a randomized controlled trial

van de Vijver, A., Polyzos, N.P., Van Landuyt, L., Mackens, S., Stoop, D., Camus, M., De Vos, M., Tournaye, H. +1 more·2016·Human Reproduction

Abstract

Study question What is the impact on clinical pregnancy rates when vitrified cleavage stage Day 3 embryos, warmed and cultured overnight to Day 4, are transferred on the 3rd or 5th day of progesterone administration in an artificial cycle? Summary answer Clinical pregnancy rates are similar when transferring a vitrified-warmed cleavage stage Day 3 embryo after overnight culture on the 3rd or 5th day of progesterone administration. What is known already In artificially prepared cycles, progesterone supplementation is generally started 3 days before embryo transfer, although the optimal length of exposure to progesterone before frozen embryo transfer (FET) has not been established. However, in a natural cycle, serum progesterone levels start to rise before ovulation, due to the LH-stimulated production by the peripheral granulosa cells. Hence, it could be postulated that progesterone supplementation before embryo transfer in an artificial cycle should start earlier or even later. Study design, size, duration Prospective, randomized controlled trial, encompassing 300 patients who had embryos frozen on Day 3 and who underwent FET in an artificial cycle. Between 1 November 2012 and 31 December 2014, 300 patients were allocated to one of two groups as soon as endometrial thickness reached ≥7 mm on ultrasound after estrogen supplementation. A computer-generated randomization list was used, not concealed to the physicians. Each patient was enrolled into the study only once. FET was p…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/dew045

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Embryonic-endometrial synchrony is attained when blastocyst-stage embryos are transferred on days 5-7 of progesterone administration.

    “randomized control trials have shown that embryonic endometrial synchrony is attained when transferring cleavage-stage embryos on days 3-5 (8) and blastocyst-stage embryos on days 5-7 of progesterone administration (8,9).”
  • Embryonic-endometrial synchrony is attained when cleavage-stage embryos are transferred on days 3-5 of progesterone administration.

    “randomized control trials have shown that embryonic endometrial synchrony is attained when transferring cleavage-stage embryos on days 3-5 (8) and blastocyst-stage embryos on days 5-7 of progesterone administration (8,9).”
  • Recent prospective data from frozen embryo transfers show that the window of endometrial receptivity is broad, contrary to earlier reports.

    “Recent prospective data using transfers of frozen embryos indicate that the WOR is rather broad, contrary to prior reports.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van de Vijver, A., Polyzos, N. P., Van Landuyt, L., Mackens, S., Stoop, D., Camus, M., De Vos, M., Tournaye, H., & Blockeel, C.
Affiliations
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (BE)
Corresponding author
Blockeel, C.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2016-03-22
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
1097-1104
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2308609916
Cited by
66
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
progesterone supplementation, frozen embryo transfer, artificial cycle, vaginal micronized progesterone, embryo transfer timing, clinical pregnancy rate, endometrial thickness, endometrial receptivity, embryo culture duration, assisted reproduction outcomes, endometrial receptivity array
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Administration, Intravaginal, Adult, Embryo Transfer, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Progesterone, Time Factors, Cryopreservation, Pregnancy Rate, Vitrification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review