The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of anxiety and depression on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study aim was to clarify the role of anxiety and depression on the outcome in assisted reproductive treatment. Previous studies on this topic have shown contradicting results, which may have been caused by population characteristics, the design of the study, or small sample sizes. METHODS: In a multicentre prospective study, 291 out of 359 (81%) consecutively invited women agreed to participate. Before down-regulation by means of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues in a long IVF protocol, patients were asked to complete the Dutch version of the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory to measure anxiety, and the Dutch version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) to measure depression. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to analyse known predictors of pregnancy and psychological factors and their relationship with treatment outcome. RESULTS: A significant relationship was shown between baseline psychological factors and the probability to become pregnant after IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment, controlling for other factors. State anxiety had a slightly stronger correlation (P = 0.01) with treatment outcome than depression (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-existing psychological factors are independently related to treatment outcome in IVF/ICSI, and should therefore be taken into account in patient counselling. Psychological factors may be improved by intervention, whereas demographic and gynaecological factors cannot. Future studies should be directed towards underlying mechanisms involved and the role of evidence-based distress reduction in order to improve treatment results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Carbin, M. G. (1988) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5 · Cited by 11,696
Psychological aspects of in vitro fertilization: a review
Eugster, A., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (1999) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00386-4 · Cited by 343
Psychological evaluation and support in a program of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer
Freeman, E. W., Boxer, A. S., Rickels, K., Tureck, R., & Mastroianni, L. (1985) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48316-0 · Cited by 319
Cited by
Homan, G. F., Davies, M., & Norman, R. (2007) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dml056 · Cited by 546
A review of psychosocial interventions in infertility
Boivin, J. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00138-2 · Cited by 380
Why do couples discontinue in vitro fertilization treatment? a cohort study
Olivius, C., Friden, B., Borg, G., & Bergh, C. (2004) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.029 · Cited by 377
Stress, distress and outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART): a meta-analysis
Matthiesen, S. M. S., Frederiksen, Y., Ingerslev, H. J., & Zachariae, R. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der246 · Cited by 284
Hämmerli, K., Znoj, H., & Barth, J. (2009) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmp002 · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Smeenk, J. M. J.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-07-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1420-1423
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2154464467
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of anxiety and depression on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/16.7.1420
- The paper
- Smeenk, J. M. J. (2001). The effect of anxiety and depression on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.7.1420
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.