The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels: a novel measure of ovarian reserve
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is produced by the granulosa cells of preantral and small antral follicles and its levels can be assessed in serum. Since the number of ovarian follicles declines with increasing age, AMH levels might be used as a marker for ovarian ageing. Therefore, we studied the relationship between AMH levels and ovarian response during ovarian stimulation for IVF. METHODS: A total of 130 patients undergoing their first IVF treatment cycle using a long protocol with GnRH agonist was prospectively included. Blood withdrawal was performed and the number of antral follicles was assessed by ultrasound on day 3 of a spontaneous cycle. Poor response and the number of oocytes were used as primary outcome measures. In a random subset of 23 patients a GnRH agonist stimulation test was performed to investigate whether a rise in FSH and LH would affect AMH levels. RESULTS: The data of 119 patients were analysed. Serum AMH levels were highly correlated with the number of antral follicles (r = 0.77; P < 0.01) and the number of oocytes retrieved (r = 0.57, P < 0.01). A negative association was found between AMH levels and poor ovarian response (fewer than 4 oocytes or cycle cancellation; OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.90, P < 0.01). Inclusion of inhibin B and FSH concentrations to AMH in a multivariate model improved the prediction of ovarian response. The post GnRH agonist rise in FSH and LH levels did not influence AMH values. CONCLUSIONS: Poor response in IVF, indicative of a diminished ovarian reserve, is associated with reduced baseline serum AMH concentrations. In line with recent observations it appears that AMH can be used as a marker for ovarian ageing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome
Broekmans, F. J., Kwee, J., Hendriks, D. J., Mol, B. W., & Lambalk, C. B. (2006) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dml034 · Cited by 1,258
Ovarian aging: mechanisms and clinical consequences
Broekmans, F. J., Soules, M. R., & Fauser, B. C. (2009) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2009-0006 · Cited by 1,248
Self-citationFertility preservation for young patients with cancer: who is at risk and what can be offered?
Wallace, W. H. B., Anderson, R. A., & Irvine, D. S. (2005) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70092-9 · Cited by 819
Pigny, P., Merlen, E., Robert, Y., Cortet-Rudelli, C., Decanter, C., Jonard, S., & Dewailly, D. (2003) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2003-030727 · Cited by 709
Raffi, F., Metwally, M., & Amer, S. (2012) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2012-1558 · Cited by 546
Metadata
- Authors
- van Rooij, I. A. J.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3065-3071
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2132421508
- Cited by
- 951
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels: a novel measure of ovarian reserve. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/17.12.3065
- The paper
- van Rooij, I. A. J. (2002). Serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels: a novel measure of ovarian reserve. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.12.3065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.