The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: IVF and embryo cryopreservation after ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer chemotherapy commonly causes premature ovarian failure and infertility. Because increased estrogen levels are thought to be potentially risky in breast cancer patients, natural cycle IVF (NCIVF) has been used to preserve fertility and treat infertility in these women. METHODS: Twelve women with breast cancer received 40-60 mg tamoxifen for 6.9 +/- 0.6 days beginning on days 2-3 of their menstrual cycle (15 cycles), and had IVF (TamIVF) with either fresh embryo transfer (six cycles) or cryopreservation (nine cycles). They were compared to a retrospective control group (n = 5) who had natural cycle IVF (NCIVF, nine cycles). RESULTS: Cycle cancellation was significantly less frequent in TamIVF, compared with NCIVF (1/15 versus 4/9, P < 0.05). Compared with NCIVF, TamIVF patients had a greater number of mature oocytes (1.6 +/- 0.3 versus 0.7 +/- 0.2, P = 0.03) and embryos (1.6 +/- 0.3 versus 0.6 +/- 0.2, P = 0.02) per initiated cycle. TamIVF resulted in the generation of embryo(s) in every patient (12/12) while only three out of five patients had an embryo following NCIVF. Two out of six patients in TamIVF, and 2/5 in NCIVF conceived. One patient in the TamIVF group delivered a set of twins. After a mean follow up of 15 +/- 3.6 months (range 3-54), none of the patients had a recurrence of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Tamoxifen stimulation appears to result in a higher number of embryos and may provide a safe method of IVF and fertility preservation in breast cancer patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fisher, S. A., Reid, R. L., Van Vugt, D. A., & Casper, R. F. (2002) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03241-7 · Cited by 347 · cited 1×
“Nevertheless, aromatase inhibitor drugs have recently been used in ovulation induction (Fisher et al., 2002), and we are conducting a prospective study to test their value for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients as they may not result in a rise in estradiol levels.”
Background
Cited by
Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Activation of Mammalian Primordial Follicles
Adhikari, D., & Liu, K. (2009) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2008-0048 · Cited by 481
Tissue-Engineered Follicles Produce Live, Fertile Offspring
Xu, M., Kreeger, P. K., Shea, L. D., & Woodruff, T. K. (2006) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/ten.2006.12.2739 · Cited by 386
Fertility Preservation in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer
Levine, J., Canada, A., & Stern, C. J. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.22.8312 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Oktay, K., Buyuk, E., Davis, O., Yermakova, I., Veeck, L., & Rosenwaks, Z.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-95
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2146519887
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: IVF and embryo cryopreservation after ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/deg045
- The paper
- Oktay, K., Buyuk, E., Davis, O., Yermakova, I., Veeck, L., & Rosenwaks, Z. (2003). Fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: IVF and embryo cryopreservation after ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.