The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that the age-related increased aneuploidy rate is correlated with reduced implantation and a higher abortion rate. Therefore, advanced maternal age (AMA) couples are a good target group to assess the possible benefit of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening (PGD-AS) on the outcome after assisted reproductive technology (ART). METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) was carried out comparing the outcome after blastocyst transfer combined with PGD-AS using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the chromosomes X, Y, 13, 16, 18, 21 and 22 in AMA couples (aged > or =37 years) with a control group without PGD-AS. From the 400 (200 for PGD-AS and 200 controls) couples that were allocated to the trial, an oocyte pick-up was performed effectively in 289 cycles (148 PGD-AS cycles and 141 control cycles). RESULTS: Positive serum HCG rates per transfer and per cycle were the same for PGD-AS and controls: 35.8% (19.6%) [%/per embryo transfer (per cycle)] and 32.2% (27.7%), respectively (NS). Significantly fewer embryos were transferred in the PGD-AS group than in the control group (P<0.001). The implantation rate (with fetal heart beat) was 17.1% in the PGD-AS group versus 11.5% in the control group (not significant; P=0.09). We observed a normal diploid status in 36.8% of the embryos. CONCLUSIONS: This RCT provides no arguments in favour of PGD-AS for improving clinical outcome per initiated cycle in patients with AMA when there are no restrictions in the number of embryos to be transferred.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos
Vanneste, E., Voet, T., Le Caignec, C., Ampe, M., Konings, P., Melotte, C., Debrock, S., Amyere, M., Vikkula, M., Schuit, F., et al. (2009) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.1924 · Cited by 880
Human embryonic stem cell lines derived from single blastomeres
Klimanskaya, I., Chung, Y., Becker, S., Lu, S.-J., & Lanza, R. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05142 · Cited by 522
Embryonic and extraembryonic stem cell lines derived from single mouse blastomeres
Chung, Y., Klimanskaya, I., Becker, S., Marh, J., Lu, S.-J., Johnson, J., Meisner, L., & Lanza, R. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04277 · Cited by 359
The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years of data collection
Harper, J. C., Wilton, L., Traeger-Synodinos, J., Goossens, V., Moutou, C., SenGupta, S. B., Pehlivan Budak, T., Renwick, P., De Rycke, M., Geraedts, J. P. M., et al. (2012) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr052 · Cited by 299
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis at 20 years
Simpson, J. L. (2010) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.2552 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Staessen, C., Platteau, P., Van Assche, E., Michiels, A., Tournaye, H., Camus, M., Devroey, P., Liebaers, I., & Van Steirteghem, A.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-12-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2849-2858
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2112594871
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/deh536
- The paper
- Staessen, C., Platteau, P., Van Assche, E., Michiels, A., Tournaye, H., Camus, M., Devroey, P., Liebaers, I., & Van Steirteghem, A. (2004). Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh536
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.