The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years of data collection
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Since it was established in 1997, the ESHRE PGD Consortium has been collecting data from international preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) centres. Ten papers have been published, including data from January 1997 to December 2007. METHODS: The data collection originally used a hard-copy format, then an excel database and finally a FileMaker Pro database. The indications are divided into five categories: PGD for chromosome abnormalities, sexing for X-linked disease, PGD for single gene defects, preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) and PGD for social sexing. The main end-points are pregnancy outcome and follow-up of deliveries. RESULTS: In data collection I, 16 centres contributed data, which increased to 57 centres by data X (average of 39 centres per data collection). These centres contributed data on over 27 000 cycles that reached oocyte retrieval. Of these cycles, 61% were for aneuploidy screening, 17% for single gene disorders, 16% for chromosomal abnormalities, 4% for sexing of X-linked disease and 2% for social sexing. Cumulatively, 5187 clinical pregnancies gave rise to 4140 deliveries and 5135 newborns (singletons: 3182, twins: 921, triplets: 37). CONCLUSIONS: In this paper, we present an overview of the first 10 years of PGD data, highlighting trends. These include the introduction of laser-assisted biopsy, an increase in polar body and trophectoderm biopsy, new strategies, methodologies and technologies for diagnosis, including recently arrays, and the more frequent use of freezing biopsied embryos. The Consortium data reports represent a valuable resource for information about the practice of PGD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification
Handyside, A. H., Kontogianni, E. H., Hardy, K., & Winston, R. M. L. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/344768a0 · Cited by 1,604
In Vitro Fertilization with Preimplantation Genetic Screening
Mastenbroek, S., Twisk, M., van Echten-Arends, J., Sikkema-Raddatz, B., Korevaar, J. C., Verhoeve, H. R., Vogel, N. E. A., Arts, E. G. J. M., de Vries, J. W. A., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa067744 · Cited by 776
De Rycke, M., Belva, F., Goossens, V., Moutou, C., SenGupta, S. B., Traeger-Synodinos, J., & Coonen, E. (2015) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dev122 · Cited by 703
Self-citationStaessen, C., Platteau, P., Van Assche, E., Michiels, A., Tournaye, H., Camus, M., Devroey, P., Liebaers, I., & Van Steirteghem, A. (2004) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deh536 · Cited by 569
Bonduelle, M., Liebaers, I., Deketelaere, V., Derde, M.-P., Camus, M., Devroey, P., & Van Steirteghem, A. (2002) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/17.3.671 · Cited by 531
Wells, D. (2000) · Molecular Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/6.11.1055 · Cited by 502
Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization
Voullaire, L., Slater, H., Williamson, R., & Wilton, L. (2000) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s004390051030 · Cited by 421
Self-citationGutiérrez-Mateo, C., Colls, P., Sánchez-García, J., Escudero, T., Prates, R., Ketterson, K., Wells, D., & Munné, S. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.010 · Cited by 310
The causes of misdiagnosis and adverse outcomes in PGD
Wilton, L., Thornhill, A., Traeger-Synodinos, J., Sermon, K. D., & Harper, J. C. (2009) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/den488 · Cited by 300
Self-citationFragouli, E., Alfarawati, S., Daphnis, D. D., Goodall, N.-N., Mania, A., Griffiths, T., Gordon, A., & Wells, D. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deq344 · Cited by 277
Cited by
Wells, D., Kaur, K., Grifo, J., Glassner, M., Taylor, J. C., Fragouli, E., & Munne, S. (2014) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102497 · Cited by 256
Ikuma, S., Sato, T., Sugiura-Ogasawara, M., Nagayoshi, M., Tanaka, A., & Takeda, S. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129958 · Cited by 89
Volozonoka, L., Miskova, A., & Gailite, L. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23094819 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Harper, J. C., Wilton, L., Traeger-Synodinos, J., Goossens, V., Moutou, C., SenGupta, S. B., Pehlivan Budak, T., Renwick, P., De Rycke, M., Geraedts, J. P. M., & Harton, G.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction Update
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-02-16
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 234-247
- ISSN
- 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2369
- OpenAlex
- W2123599028
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 31.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years of data collection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humupd/dmr052
- The paper
- Harper, J. C., Wilton, L., Traeger-Synodinos, J., Goossens, V., Moutou, C., SenGupta, S. B., Pehlivan Budak, T., Renwick, P., De Rycke, M., Geraedts, J. P. M., & Harton, G. (2012). The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years of data collection. Human Reproduction Update. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
