The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2003. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE
Abstract
BACKGROUND: European results of assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) from treatments initiated during 2003 are presented in this seventh report. METHODS: Data were mainly collected from already existing national registers. From 28 countries, 725 clinics reported 365 103 treatment cycles with: IVF 132 932, ICSI 162 149, frozen embryo replacement (FER) 60 412, oocyte donation (OD) 7548, PGD/PGS 1956 and IVM 109. Overall, this represents a 13% increase since 2002. For the third time, results on European data on intrauterine inseminations (IUIs) were reported from 19 countries. A total of 99 577 cycles (IUI-H, 82 834; IUI-D, 16 743) were included. RESULTS: In those 15 countries where all clinics reported to the register, a total of 284 765 cycles were performed in a population of 278.7 million, corresponding to 1022 cycles per million inhabitants. For IVF, the clinical pregnancy rates per aspiration and per transfer were 26.1 and 29.6%, respectively. For ICSI, the corresponding rates were 26.5 and 28.7%. After IUI-H, the clinical pregnancy rate was 12.2% in women below 40 years and 8.8% in women > or =40 years. After IVF and ICSI, the distribution of transfer of one, two, three and four or more embryos was 15.7, 55.9, 24.9 and 3.5%, respectively. Compared to the year 2002, fewer embryos were transferred, but huge differences still exist between countries. The distribution of singleton, twin and triplet deliveries for IVF and ICSI combined was 76.7, 22.0 and 1.1%, respectively. This gives a total multiple delivery rate of 23.1% compared with 24.5% in 2002. The range of triplet deliveries after IVF and ICSI varied from 0.0 to 4.4% between countries. After IUI-H in women below 40 years of age, 11.4% were twin and 2.2% triplet gestations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nyboe Andersen, A., Goossens, V., Bhattacharya, S., Ferraretti, A. P., Kupka, M. S., de Mouzon, J., & Nygren, K. G. (2009) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dep035 · Cited by 599
Self-citationLampic, C., Svanberg, A. S., Karlström, P., & Tydén, T. (2006) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dei367 · Cited by 474
The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries
Chambers, G. M., Sullivan, E. A., Ishihara, O., Chapman, M. G., & Adamson, G. D. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.029 · Cited by 438
Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States
Reefhuis, J., Honein, M. A., Schieve, L. A., Correa, A., Hobbs, C. A., Rasmussen, S. A., & Study, T. N. B. D. P. (2009) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/den387 · Cited by 306
Twin Peaks: more twinning in humans than ever before
Monden, C., Pison, G., & Smits, J. (2021) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deab029 · Cited by 234
Metadata
- Authors
- Andersen, A. N., Goossens, V., Gianaroli, L., Felberbaum, R., de Mouzon, J., & Nygren, K. G.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-03-21
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1513-1525
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2107242272
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 50.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2003. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/dem053
- The paper
- Andersen, A. N., Goossens, V., Gianaroli, L., Felberbaum, R., de Mouzon, J., & Nygren, K. G. (2007). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2003. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.