The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Searching for evidence of disease and malignant cell contamination in ovarian tissue stored from hematologic cancer patients
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Storing ovarian tissue for fertility preservation in cancer patients carries the risk of the presence of malignant cells that could lead to recurrence of cancer after reimplantation. Methods to exclude presence of cancer cells were used to improve the safety of cryopreservation-reimplantation procedures. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with hematological malignancies were referred for the storage of ovarian tissue for fertility preservation. Investigation included preoperative imaging and histological evaluation of fresh ovarian tissue. After thawing markers to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) were used and compared with patient's disease used as positive control (five patients). RESULTS: Preoperative imaging detected disease in the ovaries (two patients). Conventional histology post-tissue harvesting did not disclose malignant cells (56 patients). MRD results post-thawing were negative in Hodgkin's disease (CD30 immunohistochemical staining), in T- and B-cell lymphoma (PCR for T-cell receptor and Ig clones, respectively) and in two chronic myelogenous leukemia patients (RT-PCR for BCR-ABL gene expression). However, highly sensitive real-time RT-PCR was positive in one CML patient and, this alarming result avoided tissue transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative imaging prevented operations and storage of tissue with cancer. Evaluation of stored ovarian tissue for MRD using sensitive markers is essential to increase safety and to prevent reimplantation of tissue with malignant cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2019) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.09.013 · Cited by 753
Children born after autotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. A review of 13 live births
Donnez, J., Silber, S., Andersen, C. Y., Demeestere, I., Piver, P., Meirow, D., Pellicer, A., & Dolmans, M.-M. (2011) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.3109/07853890.2010.546807 · Cited by 342
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Meirow, D., Hardan, I., Dor, J., Fridman, E., Elizur, S., Ra'anani, H., Slyusarevsky, E., Amariglio, N., Schiff, E., Rechavi, G., Nagler, A., & Yehuda, D. B.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-05-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1007-1013
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2158427154
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Searching for evidence of disease and malignant cell contamination in ovarian tissue stored from hematologic cancer patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/den055
- The paper
- Meirow, D., Hardan, I., Dor, J., Fridman, E., Elizur, S., Ra'anani, H., Slyusarevsky, E., Amariglio, N., Schiff, E., Rechavi, G., Nagler, A., & Yehuda, D. B. (2008). Searching for evidence of disease and malignant cell contamination in ovarian tissue stored from hematologic cancer patients. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.