Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Children born after autotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. A review of 13 live births

Open access
Donnez, Jacques, Silber, Sherman, Andersen, Claus Yding, Demeestere, Isabelle, Piver, Pascal, Meirow, Dror, Pellicer, Antonio, Dolmans, Marie-Madeleine·2011·Annals of Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. Premature ovarian failure (POF) can occur naturally at an early age or be due to iatrogenic agents. Indeed, ovaries are very sensitive to cytotoxic treatment, especially to radiation and alkylating agents. METHODS. Several options are currently available to preserve fertility in cancer patients and allow them to conceive when they have overcome their disease: embryo cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue is the only option available for pre-pubertal girls and women who cannot delay the start of chemotherapy. FINDINGS. Since the first live birth after autotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in humans was reported in 2004, orthotopic reimplantation has led to the birth of 13 healthy babies. Restoration of ovarian activity and prognostic factors are evaluated by comparison with 7 cases of fresh ovarian tissue transplantation. We report 13 live births after orthotopic transplantation of frozen-thawed ovarian tissue in cancer patients (n = 8) and in patients treated with high doses of chemotherapy for benign diseases (n = 2) (microscopic polyangiitis, sickle cell anemia). INTERPRETATION. Based on our review, we believe that ovarian cortex cryopreservation, associated or not with cryopreservation of immature oocytes, should be offered before gonadotoxic chemotherapy in all cases where there is a high risk of POF and where emergency IVF is not possible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/07853890.2010.546807

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 342

Metadata

Authors
Donnez, J., Silber, S., Andersen, C. Y., Demeestere, I., Piver, P., Meirow, D., Pellicer, A., & Dolmans, M.-M.
Venue
Annals of Medicine
Published
2011-01-13
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
437-450
ISSN
  • 0785-3890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2060
OpenAlex
W1983721719
Cited by
342
References
34
FWCI
57.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Children born after autotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. A review of 13 live births. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/07853890.2010.546807
The paper
Donnez, J., Silber, S., Andersen, C. Y., Demeestere, I., Piver, P., Meirow, D., Pellicer, A., & Dolmans, M.-M. (2011). Children born after autotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. A review of 13 live births. Annals of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890.2010.546807

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.