Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 246

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Uterine natural killer cells and angiogenesis in recurrent reproductive failure

Quenby, S., Nik, H., Innes, B., Lash, G., Turner, M., Drury, J., Bulmer, J.·2008·Human Reproduction

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased numbers of phenotypically unusual CD56(bright) CD16- uterine natural killer (uNK) cells have been associated with recurrent reproductive failure. uNK cells produce angiogenic growth factors and are potential regulators of decidual angiogenesis in early pregnancy. The final common mechanism for early pregnancy loss is thought to be early onset of the maternal circulation and excessive placental oxidative stress. We tested the hypothesis that increased uNK cells in preimplantation endometrium are associated with altered angiogenesis. METHODS: Women with recurrent reproductive failure (n = 122) were investigated with uterine artery Doppler and endometrial biopsy. Immunohistochemistry was used to identify uNK, endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells and image analysis was used to assess location, density and differentiation. RESULTS: uNK cell density was positively correlated with the formation of blood (P = 0.005, r = 0.5) and lymphatic vessels (P = 0.0001, r = 0.6), spiral arteriole smooth muscle differentiation (P = 0.01, r = 0.5) and endometrial oedema (P = 0.004). The functional effect of this was a reduced uterine artery resistance to blood flow. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that uNK cells may regulate angiogenesis in non-pregnant endometrium. The mechanisms of reproductive failure associated with increased uNK cell density appear to be increased angiogenesis and peri-implantation blood flow, which may lead to early maternal circulation and hence pregnancy failure due to excessive oxidative stress.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/den348

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 246

Metadata

Authors
Quenby, S., Nik, H., Innes, B., Lash, G., Turner, M., Drury, J., & Bulmer, J.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2008-10-14
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
45-54
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2130700174
Cited by
246
References
4
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uterine natural killer cells and angiogenesis in recurrent reproductive failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/den348
The paper
Quenby, S., Nik, H., Innes, B., Lash, G., Turner, M., Drury, J., & Bulmer, J. (2008). Uterine natural killer cells and angiogenesis in recurrent reproductive failure. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den348

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.