The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Embryo development of fresh 'versus' vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A successful oocyte cryopreservation programme is of utmost importance where a limited number of oocytes can be inseminated per cycle, to overcome legal and ethical issues related to embryo storage, for oocyte donation programmes and for fertility preservation (especially for cancer patients). Vitrification has been recently proposed as an effective procedure for this purpose. METHODS: In order to validate the effectiveness of oocyte vitrification a non-inferiority trial was started on sibling metaphase II (MII) oocytes. To demonstrate the non-inferiority based on an absolute difference of 17% in the fertilization rate per sibling oocyte, a minimum of 222 oocytes were required. After oocyte denudation, MII oocytes with normal morphology were randomly allocated to fresh ICSI insemination or to vitrification procedure. If pregnancy was not obtained a subsequent ICSI cycle was performed with warmed oocytes of the same cohort. In both groups, three oocytes were inseminated per cycle by ICSI procedure. Primary end-points were fertilization rates calculated per warmed and per injected oocytes. Secondary end-points were zygote and embryo morphology. RESULTS: A total of 244 oocytes were involved in this study. Of the 120 fresh sibling oocytes inseminated, 100 were fertilized (83.3%). Survival rate of sibling vitrified oocytes was 96.8% (120/124 oocytes). Fertilization rate after ICSI was 76.6% (95/124) per warmed oocyte and 79.2% (95/120) per survived/inseminated oocyte. No statistical difference in fertilization rates was observed between the two groups when calculated per sibling oocytes (absolute difference -6.73%; OR: 0.65; 95% CI = 0.33-1.29; P = 0.20) and per inseminated oocyte (absolute difference -4.17%; OR: 0.76; 95% CI = 0.37-1.53; P = 0.50). Embryo development was also similar in both treatment groups up till Day 2. The percentage of excellent quality embryos was 52.0% (52/100) in the fresh group and 51.6% (49/95) in the vitrification group (absolute difference -0.43%; OR: 0.98; 95% CI = 0.53-1.79; P = 0.9). The mean age of the 40 patients included in this study was 35.5 +/- 4.8 years (range 26-42). Fifteen clinical pregnancies were obtained in the vitrification cycles of 39 embryo transfers performed (37.5% per cycle, 38.5% per embryo transfer), with an implantation rate of 20.2% (19/94). Three spontaneous miscarriages occurred (20%). Twelve pregnancies are ongoing (30.0% per cycle, 30.8% per embryo transfer) beyond 12 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that oocyte vitrification procedure followed by ICSI is not inferior to fresh insemination procedure, with regard to fertilization and embryo developmental rates. Moreover, ongoing clinical pregnancy is compatible with this procedure, even with a restricted number of oocytes available for insemination. The promising clinical results obtained, in a population of infertile patients, need to be confirmed on a larger scale. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: iSRCTN60158641.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes
Kuwayama, M., Vajta, G., Kato, O., & Leibo, S. P. (2005) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60837-1 · Cited by 1,254
Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: The Cryotop method
Kuwayama, M. (2007) · Theriogenology · doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.09.014 · Cited by 855
Cobo, A., Kuwayama, M., Pérez, S., Ruiz, A., Pellicer, A., & Remohí, J. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.050 · Cited by 565
Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes: Case Report
Kuleshova, L., Gianaroli, L., Magli, C., Ferraretti, A., & Trounson, A. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.12.3077 · Cited by 557
Human oocyte cryopreservation: new perspectives regarding oocyte survival
Fabbri, R., Porcu, E., Marsella, T., Rocchetta, G., Venturoli, S., & Flamigni, C. (2001) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/16.3.411 · Cited by 484
Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification
Vajta, G., & Nagy, Z. P. (2006) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61091-7 · Cited by 403
Viral Contamination of Embryos Cryopreserved in Liquid Nitrogen
Bielański, A., Nadin‐Davis, S. A., Sapp, T., & Lutze-Wallace, C. L. (2000) · Cryobiology · doi:10.1006/cryo.1999.2227 · Cited by 307
Obstetric and perinatal outcome in 200 infants conceived from vitrified oocytes
Chian, R.-C., Huang, J. Y., Tan, S. L., Lucena, E., Saa, A., Rojas, A., Castellón, L. A. R., García Amador, M. I., & Sarmiento, J. E. M. (2008) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60471-3 · Cited by 256
Cryotop vitrification of human oocytes results in high survival rate and healthy deliveries
Antinori, M., Licata, E., Dani, G., Cerusico, F., Versaci, C., & Antinori, S. (2007) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60766-3 · Cited by 245
Ubaldi, F., Bourgain, C., Tournaye, H. J., Smitz, J. E. J., Steirteghem, A. V., & Devroey, P. (1997) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)80080-5 · Cited by 229
Self-citation
Cited by
Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline
(2013) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.028 · Cited by 928
(2019) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.09.013 · Cited by 753
Cobo, A., Meseguer, M., Remohi, J., & Pellicer, A. (2010) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deq146 · Cited by 555
Elliott, G. D., Wang, S., & Fuller, B. J. (2017) · Cryobiology · doi:10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.04.004 · Cited by 534
Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Coccia, P. F., Pappo, A. S., Beaupin, L., Borges, V. F., Borinstein, S. C., Chugh, R., Dinner, S., Folbrecht, J., Frazier, A. L., Goldsby, R., et al. (2018) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2018.0001 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Rienzi, L., Romano, S., Albricci, L., Maggiulli, R., Capalbo, A., Baroni, E., Colamaria, S., Sapienza, F., & Ubaldi, F.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-10-27
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-73
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2127134302
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 31.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Embryo development of fresh 'versus' vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/dep346
- The paper
- Rienzi, L., Romano, S., Albricci, L., Maggiulli, R., Capalbo, A., Baroni, E., Colamaria, S., Sapienza, F., & Ubaldi, F. (2010). Embryo development of fresh 'versus' vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep346
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.