The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Circulating progesterone levels and ongoing pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for in vitro fertilization: analysis of over 4000 cycles
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The influence of elevated serum progesterone levels during in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles on pregnancy rates is a matter of continued debate among fertility clinicians. Efforts to resolve this question have been impeded by the various assays used to measure progesterone and the different, arbitrary threshold values for defining 'high' progesterone levels. METHODS: A non-interventional, retrospective, observational, single-centre cohort study evaluated the relationship between serum progesterone levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration and the ongoing pregnancy rate in 4032 patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues for pituitary down-regulation. RESULTS: Ongoing pregnancy rates were inversely associated with serum progesterone levels on the day of hCG (P < 0.001 for overall trend), irrespective of the GnRH analogue used for pituitary down-regulation. Patients with serum progesterone levels < or = 1.5 ng/ml had significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rates than those with progesterone levels >1.5 ng/ml (31.0 versus 19.1%; P = 0.00006); odds ratio, 0.53 (95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.72). Multivariate regression analysis showed that daily follicle-stimulating hormone dose, number of oocytes and estradiol values on the day of hCG administration were positively associated with progesterone levels (P < 0.0001 for all). Serum progesterone levels were significantly greater in women treated with GnRH agonists (n = 1177) versus antagonists (n = 2855; 0.84 +/- 0.67 versus 0.75 +/- 0.66 ng/ml; P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated serum progesterone levels on the day of hCG administration is associated with reduced ongoing pregnancy rates. In particular, serum progesterone levels of >1.5 ng/ml were associated with lower ongoing pregnancy rates following IVF/ICSI cycles irrespective of the GnRH analogue used for pituitary down-regulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Frozen embryo transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation and timing
Mackens, S., Santos-Ribeiro, S., van de Vijver, A., Racca, A., Van Landuyt, L., Tournaye, H., & Blockeel, C. (2017) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dex285 · Cited by 361
Labarta, E., Martinez-Conejero, J. A., Alama, P., Horcajadas, J. A., Pellicer, A., Simon, C., & Bosch, E. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der126 · Cited by 346
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bosch, E., Labarta, E., Crespo, J., Simón, C., Remohí, J., Jenkins, J., & Pellicer, A.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-06-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2092-2100
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2116774269
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circulating progesterone levels and ongoing pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for in vitro fertilization: analysis of over 4000 cycles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/deq125
- The paper
- Bosch, E., Labarta, E., Crespo, J., Simón, C., Remohí, J., Jenkins, J., & Pellicer, A. (2010). Circulating progesterone levels and ongoing pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for in vitro fertilization: analysis of over 4000 cycles. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.