The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Glucose consumption of single post-compaction human embryos is predictive of embryo sex and live birth outcome
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between nutrient utilization by the human embryo and its subsequent viability after transfer. METHODS The embryos of 50 patients having single blastocyst transfer were cultured individually from Day 3 in 10 µl drops of medium G2 under Ovoil in 5%O(2), 6%CO(2), 89%N(2). Patient inclusion in the study was maternal age ≤ 38. Embryos were moved to fresh drops of medium every 24 h. Spent media samples, including controls containing no embryo, were coded, frozen and subsequently analysed blind. Analysis of glucose was performed by microfluorimetry. The sex of children born was recorded. RESULTS: Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were 58 and 56%, respectively. Glucose consumption by embryos which resulted in a pregnancy was significantly higher on both Day 4 and Day 5 than that by embryos which failed to develop post-transfer (P < 0.01). Furthermore, on Day 4 female embryos consumed 28% more glucose compared with males (P < 0.05). Glucose uptake was independent of embryo grade. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid screening of glucose metabolism by the human embryo on Day 4 and 5 may prove to be a useful metric in the development of algorithms for the selection of embryos for transfer in human IVF. Also, the observed sex-related metabolic difference provides preliminary data to support the hypothesis that male and female human embryos differ in their physiology due to the presence of two active X chromosomes and an altered proteome for a finite time during the preimplantation period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tran, D., Cooke, S., Illingworth, P. J., & Gardner, D. K. (2019) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dez064 · Cited by 312
Self-citationGlycolytic Metabolism Plays a Functional Role in Regulating Human Pluripotent Stem Cell State
Gu, W., Gaeta, X., Sahakyan, A., Chan, A. B., Hong, C. S., Kim, R., Braas, D., Plath, K., Lowry, W. E., & Christofk, H. R. (2016) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.08.008 · Cited by 283
Li, B., Ma, Y., Huang, J., Xiao, X., Li, L., Liu, C., Shi, Y., Wang, D., & Wang, X. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113392 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Gardner, D. K., Wale, P. L., Collins, R., & Lane, M.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-05-13
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1981-1986
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2160428364
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glucose consumption of single post-compaction human embryos is predictive of embryo sex and live birth outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/der143
- The paper
- Gardner, D. K., Wale, P. L., Collins, R., & Lane, M. (2011). Glucose consumption of single post-compaction human embryos is predictive of embryo sex and live birth outcome. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.