The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer
Open accessAbstract
STUDY QUESTION: Can a deep learning model predict the probability of pregnancy with fetal heart (FH) from time-lapse videos? SUMMARY ANSWER: We created a deep learning model named IVY, which was an objective and fully automated system that predicts the probability of FH pregnancy directly from raw time-lapse videos without the need for any manual morphokinetic annotation or blastocyst morphology assessment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The contribution of time-lapse imaging in effective embryo selection is promising. Existing algorithms for the analysis of time-lapse imaging are based on morphology and morphokinetic parameters that require subjective human annotation and thus have intrinsic inter-reader and intra-reader variability. Deep learning offers promise for the automation and standardization of embryo selection. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A retrospective analysis of time-lapse videos and clinical outcomes of 10 638 embryos from eight different IVF clinics, across four different countries, between January 2014 and December 2018. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The deep learning model was trained using time-lapse videos with known FH pregnancy outcome to perform a binary classification task of predicting the probability of pregnancy with FH given time-lapse video sequence. The predictive power of the model was measured using the average area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve over 5-fold stratified cross-validation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The deep learning model was able to predict FH pregnancy from time-lapse videos with an AUC of 0.93 [95% CI 0.92-0.94] in 5-fold stratified cross-validation. A hold-out validation test across eight laboratories showed that the AUC was reproducible, ranging from 0.95 to 0.90 across different laboratories with different culture and laboratory processes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is a retrospective analysis demonstrating that the deep learning model has a high level of predictability of the likelihood that an embryo will implant. The clinical impacts of these findings are still uncertain. Further studies, including prospective randomized controlled trials, are required to evaluate the clinical significance of this deep learning model. The time-lapse videos collected for training and validation are Day 5 embryos; hence, additional adjustment would need to be made for the model to be used in the context of Day 3 transfer. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The high predictive value for embryo implantation obtained by the deep learning model may improve the effectiveness of previous approaches used for time-lapse imaging in embryo selection. This may improve the prioritization of the most viable embryo for a single embryo transfer. The deep learning model may also prove to be useful in providing the optimal order for subsequent transfers of cryopreserved embryos. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): D.T. is the co-owner of Harrison AI that has patented this methodology in association with Virtus Health. P.I. is a shareholder in Virtus Health. S.C., P.I. and D.G. are all either employees or contracted with Virtus Health. D.G. has received grant support from Vitrolife, the manufacturer of the Embryoscope time-lapse imaging used in this study. The equipment and time for this study have been jointly provided by Harrison AI and Virtus Health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An introduction to ROC analysis
Fawcett, T. (2006) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 · Cited by 21,879
Kuhn, M., & Johnson, K. (2013) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3 · Cited by 6,788
Mechanisms of fatty acid-induced inhibition of glucose uptake.
Boden, G., Chen, X., Ruiz, J., White, J. V., & Rossetti, L. (1994) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci117252 · Cited by 3,705
BIRTH AFTER THE REIMPLANTATION OF A HUMAN EMBRYO
Steptoe, P. C., & Edwards, R. G. (1978) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(78)92957-4 · Cited by 2,614
Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer
Gardner, D. K., Lane, M., Stevens, J., Schlenker, T., & Schoolcraft, W. B. (2000) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00518-5 · Cited by 2,091
Self-citationThe Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology, Balaban, B., Brison, D., Calderon, G., Catt, J., Conaghan, J., Cowan, L., Ebner, T., Gardner, D., Hardarson, T., et al. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der037 · Cited by 2,015
Self-citationMeasures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions.
Šimundić, A.-M. (2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 1,364
Measures of diagnostic accuracy: basic definitions
Šimundić, A.-M. (2009) · Medical and Biological Sciences · Cited by 1,136
A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in- vitro fertilization
Gardner, D. K., Schoolcraft, W. B., Wagley, L., Schlenker, T., Stevens, J., & Hesla, J. (1998) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434 · Cited by 742
Self-citationOn determining the most appropriate test cut-off value: the case of tests with continuous results
Habibzadeh, F., Habibzadeh, P., & Yadollahie, M. (2016) · Biochemia Medica · doi:10.11613/bm.2016.034 · Cited by 694
Cited by
VerMilyea, M., Hall, J. M. M., Diakiw, S. M., Johnston, A., Nguyen, T., Perugini, D., Miller, A., Picou, A., Murphy, A. P., & Perugini, M. (2020) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deaa013 · Cited by 331
Dhombres, F., Bonnard, J., Bailly, K., Maurice, P., Papageorghiou, A. T., & Jouannic, J.-M. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/35465 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Tran, D., Cooke, S., Illingworth, P. J., & Gardner, D. K.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-05-21
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1011-1018
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2949941775
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 32.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/dez064
- The paper
- Tran, D., Cooke, S., Illingworth, P. J., & Gardner, D. K. (2019). Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez064
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.