Cited by 127Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesMale Reproductive Health Studies

ESHRE special interest group for andrology basic semen analysis course: a continued focus on accuracy, quality, efficiency and clinical relevance

Barratt, C. L. R., Bjorndahl, L., Menkveld, R., Mortimer, D.·2011·Human Reproduction

Abstract

ESHRE has been running courses for basic semen analysis since 1994 and course material has been updated regularly in response to new findings and publications. Following publication of the 5th edition of the WHO laboratory manual, entitled WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen (WHO5), the Subcommittee for training of the ESHRE Special Interest Group for Andrology evaluated potential amendments to its course. In respect of the updated ESHRE course, there are eight particular areas of discourse that are reviewed (i) maintaining the four-class differential motility count allowing distinction between rapid and slow progressive sperm for assisted reproduction technology. (ii) Maintaining the four-category assessment for sperm morphology with calculation of the teratozoospermic index. (iii) Continuing to advocate the use of three categories of results: 'normal', 'borderline' and 'abnormal' with respect to the clinical interpretation of the data. (iv) Presenting clear and unequivocal methods for performing assessments e.g. morphology. (v) Correcting the inconsistencies in WHO5, some of which are actually erroneous. (vi) Reducing the requirements for substantial extra work for what are unestablished improvements in accuracy and/or precision in the final results. (vii) Presentation of logical methods of sperm preparation. (viii) Discussion of the suddenly changed limits between fertile and subfertile men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/der312

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barratt, C. L. R., Bjorndahl, L., Menkveld, R., & Mortimer, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Barratt, C. L. R.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2011-09-28
Volume
26
Issue
12
Pages
3207-3212
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2099950831
Cited by
127
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
Keywords
semen analysis, sperm morphology assessment, sperm preparation, male fertility, subfertile men, assisted reproduction
MeSH terms
Education, Continuing, Humans, Male, Public Opinion, Semen, World Health Organization, Andrology, Semen Analysis, Reproductive Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review