The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE†
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This 12th European IVF-monitoring (EIM) report presents the results of treatments involving assisted reproductive technology (ART) initiated in Europe during 2008. METHODS: From 36 countries (3 more compared with 2007), 1051 clinics reported 532 260 treatment cycles including: IVF (124 539), ICSI (280 552), frozen embryo replacements (FER, 97 120), egg donation (ED, 13 609), in vitro maturation (IVM, 562), preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS, 2875) and frozen oocyte replacements (FOR, 4080). Overall, this represents a 7.9% increase in the activity since 2007, which is mainly related to an increase in cycles from almost all registers and only partially to the new countries entering EIM (Estonia, Kazakhstan, Moldova and Romania, 5480 cycles in total). European data on intrauterine insemination using husband/partner's (IUI-H) and donor (IUI-D) semen were reported from 27 and 21 countries, respectively. A total of 144 509 IUI-H (+1.5%) and 24 960 IUI-D (-4.3%) cycles were included. RESULTS: In 19 countries where all clinics reported to the ART register, a total of 350 143 ART cycles were performed in a population of 369.8 million, corresponding to 947 cycles per million inhabitants. For IVF, the clinical pregnancy rates per aspiration and per transfer were 28.5 and 32.5%, respectively, and for ICSI the corresponding rates were 28.7 and 31.9%. In FER cycles, the pregnancy rate per thawing was 19.3%. The delivery rate after IUI was 9.1% for IUI-H and 13.8% for IUI-D. In IVF and ICSI cycles, one, two, three and four or more embryos were transferred in 22.4, 53.2, 22.3 and 2.1%, respectively. The proportions of singleton, twin and triplet deliveries after IVF and ICSI (combined) were 78.3, 20.7 and 1.0%, respectively, resulting in a total multiple delivery rate of 21.7%, compared with 22.3% in 2007, 20.8% in 2006 and 21.8% in 2005. In FER cycles, the multiple delivery rate was 13.7% (13.4% twins and 0.3% triplets). In women undergoing IUI, twin and triplet deliveries occurred in 10.6% and 0.7% with IUI-H and in 9.4 and 0.3% with IUI-D, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with previous years, there was an increase in the reported number of ART cycles in Europe. For the first time in 5 years, the pregnancy rates failed to show a year-on-year increase. Compared with 2007, the number of transfers of multiple embryos (3+) and a multiple delivery rate showed a marginal decline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., de Mouzon, J., Ishihara, O., Mansour, R., Nygren, K., Sullivan, E., van der Poel, S., & WHO, O. B. O. I. A. (2009) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dep343 · Cited by 1,043
Self-citationNyboe Andersen, A., Goossens, V., Bhattacharya, S., Ferraretti, A. P., Kupka, M. S., de Mouzon, J., & Nygren, K. G. (2009) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dep035 · Cited by 599
Self-citation
Cited by
Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHRE
Kupka, M. S., Ferraretti, A. P., de Mouzon, J., Erb, K., D'Hooghe, T., Castilla, J. A., Calhaz-Jorge, C., De Geyter, C., Goossens, V., Strohmer, H., et al. (2014) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deu175 · Cited by 462
Self-citationAssisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hansen, M., Kurinczuk, J. J., Milne, E., de Klerk, N., & Bower, C. (2013) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmt006 · Cited by 384
Fertility Treatments and Multiple Births in the United States
Kulkarni, A. D., Jamieson, D. J., Jones, H. W., Kissin, D. M., Gallo, M. F., Macaluso, M., & Adashi, E. Y. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1301467 · Cited by 308
Chambers, G. M., Hoang, V. P., Sullivan, E. A., Chapman, M. G., Ishihara, O., Zegers-Hochschild, F., Nygren, K. G., & Adamson, G. D. (2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.005 · Cited by 168
Self-citationThe association of placenta previa and assisted reproductive techniques: a meta-analysis
Karami, M., Jenabi, E., & Fereidooni, B. (2018) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1080/14767058.2017.1332035 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferraretti, A. P., Goossens, V., de Mouzon, J., Bhattacharya, S., Castilla, J. A., Korsak, V., Kupka, M., Nygren, K. G., Nyboe Andersen, A., (EIM), T. E. I.-M., & Consortium, F. T. E. S. O. H. R. A. E. (.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-07-10
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2571-2584
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2101969349
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 67.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE†. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/des255
- The paper
- Ferraretti, A. P., Goossens, V., de Mouzon, J., Bhattacharya, S., Castilla, J. A., Korsak, V., Kupka, M., Nygren, K. G., Nyboe Andersen, A., (EIM), T. E. I.-M., & Consortium, F. T. E. S. O. H. R. A. E. (. (2012). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE†. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des255
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.