Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHRE

Open access
Kupka, M. S., Ferraretti, A. P., de Mouzon, J., Erb, K., D'Hooghe, T., Castilla, J. A., Calhaz-Jorge, C., De Geyter, C., Goossens, V., Strohmer, H., Obruca, Kreuz-Kinderwunschzentrum, S. P. G., Bogaerts, K., Biostat, I., D'Hooghe, T., Kyurkchiev, S., Antonova, I., Rezabek, K., Markova, J., Erb, K., Gissler, M., Tiitinen, A., Royere, D., Buhler, K., Uszkoriet, M., Loutradis, D., Tarlatzis, B. C., Kosztolanyi, G., Urbancsek, J., Bjorgvinsson, H., Mocanu, E., Scaravelli, G., Lokshin, V., Ravil, V., Gudleviciene, Z., Matkeviciute, G., Lazarevski, S., Moshin, V., Simic, T. M., Vukicevic, D., Hazekamp, J. T., Kurzawa, R., Calhaz--Jorge, C., Laranjeira, A. R., Rugescu, I., Korsak, V., Radunovic, N., Tabs, N., Tomazevic, T., Virant-Klun, I., Hernandez, J. H., Castilla Alcala, J. A., Bergh, C., Weder, M., De Geyter, C., Smeenk, J. M. J., Lambalk, C., Veselovsky, V., Baranowski, R., The European IVF-monitoring (EIM), Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)·2014·Human Reproduction

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: The 14th European IVF--monitoring (EIM) report presents the results of medically assisted reproduction treatments including assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles and intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles initiated in Europe during 2010: are there changes in the trends compared with previous years? SUMMARY ANSWER: Despite some fluctuations in the number of countries reporting, the overall number of ART cycles has continued to increase year by year, and while pregnancy rates in 2010 remained similar to those reported in 2009, the number of transfers with multiple embryos (three or more) further declined. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Since 1997, ART data in Europe have been collected and reported in 13 manuscripts, published in Human Reproduction. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Retrospective collection of European ART data by the EIM Consortium for ESHRE; data were collected from cycles started between 1st January and 31st December 2010 by the National Registries of individual European countries, or on a voluntary basis by personal information for European countries without a national registry. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING, METHODS: Out of 31 countries, 991 clinics reported 550 296 ART treatment cycles: IVF (125 994), ICSI (272 771), frozen embryo replacement (FER, 114 593), egg donation (ED, 25 187), in vitro maturation (493), preimplantation genetic diagnosis/preimplantation genetic screening (6399) and frozen oocyte replacements (4859). European data on IUI using husband/partner's semen (IUI-H) or donor semen (IUI-D) were reported from 22 and 19 countries, respectively. A total of 176 512 IUI-H (+8.4% compared with 2009) and 38 124 IUI-D (+30.4% compared with 2009) cycles were included. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In 16 countries where all clinics reported to the national ART registry, a total of 267 120 ART cycles were performed in a population of 219 million inhabitants, corresponding to 1221 cycles per million inhabitants. For IVF, the clinical pregnancy rates per aspiration and per transfer increased to 29.2 and 33.2%, respectively, and for ICSI, the corresponding rates also increased to 28.8 and 32.0%, when compared with the rates of 2009. In FER cycles, the pregnancy rate per thawing was 20.3%; in ED cycles the pregnancy rate per fresh transfer was 47.4% and per thawed transfer 33.3%. The delivery rate after IUI-H was 8.9 and 13.8% after IUI-D. In IVF and ICSI cycles, one, two, three and four or more embryos were transferred in 25.7, 56.7, 16.1 and 1.5%, respectively. The proportions of singleton, twin and triplet deliveries after IVF and ICSI (combined) were 79.4, 19.6 and 1.0%, respectively, resulting in a total multiple delivery rate of 20.6% compared with 20.2% in 2009, 21.7% in 2008, 22.3% in 2007, 20.8% in 2006. In FER cycles, the multiple delivery rate was 12.8% (12.5% twins and 0.3% triplets). Twin and triplet delivery rates associated with IUI cycles were 9.6/0.5 and 8.5/0.2%, following treatment with husband and donor semen, respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The method of reporting is not standardized in Europe but varies among countries. Furthermore registries from a number of countries have been unable to provide some of the relevant data such as initiated cycles and deliveries. Therefore, results should be interpreted with caution. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The 14th ESHRE report on ART and IUI treatments shows a continuing expansion of the number of ART treatment cycles in Europe, with more than half a million of cycles reported in 2010. The use of ICSI may have reached a plateau. When compared with 2009/2008, pregnancy and (multiple) delivery rates after IVF and ICSI remained relatively stable. The number of multiple embryo transfers (three or more embryos) has shown a decline. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The study has no external funding; all costs are covered by ESHRE. There are no competing interests.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/deu175

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Kupka, M. S., Ferraretti, A. P., de Mouzon, J., Erb, K., D'Hooghe, T., Castilla, J. A., Calhaz-Jorge, C., De Geyter, C., Goossens, V., Strohmer, H., Obruca, Kreuz-Kinderwunschzentrum, S. P. G., Bogaerts, K., Biostat, I., D'Hooghe, T., Kyurkchiev, S., Antonova, I., Rezabek, K., Markova, J., Erb, K., Gissler, M., Tiitinen, A., Royere, D., Buhler, K., Uszkoriet, M., Loutradis, D., Tarlatzis, B. C., Kosztolanyi, G., Urbancsek, J., Bjorgvinsson, H., Mocanu, E., Scaravelli, G., Lokshin, V., Ravil, V., Gudleviciene, Z., Matkeviciute, G., Lazarevski, S., Moshin, V., Simic, T. M., Vukicevic, D., Hazekamp, J. T., Kurzawa, R., Calhaz--Jorge, C., Laranjeira, A. R., Rugescu, I., Korsak, V., Radunovic, N., Tabs, N., Tomazevic, T., Virant-Klun, I., Hernandez, J. H., Castilla Alcala, J. A., Bergh, C., Weder, M., De Geyter, C., Smeenk, J. M. J., Lambalk, C., Veselovsky, V., Baranowski, R., (EIM), T. E. I.-M., & Consortium, F. T. E. S. O. H. R. A. E. (.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2014-07-27
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
2099-2113
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2166195927
Cited by
462
References
23
FWCI
79.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/deu175
The paper
Kupka, M. S., Ferraretti, A. P., de Mouzon, J., Erb, K., D'Hooghe, T., Castilla, J. A., Calhaz-Jorge, C., De Geyter, C., Goossens, V., Strohmer, H., Obruca, Kreuz-Kinderwunschzentrum, S. P. G., Bogaerts, K., Biostat, I., D'Hooghe, T., Kyurkchiev, S., Antonova, I., Rezabek, K., Markova, J., . . . Consortium, F. T. E. S. O. H. R. A. E. (. (2014). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu175

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.