The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
First trimester phthalate exposure and anogenital distance in newborns
Open accessAbstract
STUDY QUESTION: Is first trimester phthalate exposure associated with anogenital distance (AGD), a biomarker of prenatal androgen exposure, in newborns? SUMMARY ANSWER: Concentrations of diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) metabolites in first trimester maternal urine samples are inversely associated with AGD in male, but not female, newborns. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: AGD is a sexually dimorphic measure reflecting prenatal androgen exposure. Prenatal phthalate exposure has been associated with shorter male AGD in multiple animal studies. Prior human studies, which have been limited by small sample size and imprecise timing of exposure and/or outcome, have reported conflicting results. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The Infant Development and the Environment Study (TIDES) is a prospective cohort study of pregnant women recruited in prenatal clinics in San Francisco, CA, Minneapolis, MN, Rochester, NY and Seattle, WA in 2010-2012. Participants delivered 787 infants; 753 with complete data are included in this analysis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Any woman over 18 years old who was able to read and write English (or Spanish in CA), who was <13 weeks pregnant, whose pregnancy was not medically threatened and who planned to deliver in a study hospital was eligible to participate. Analyses include all infants whose mothers provided a first trimester urine sample and who were examined at or shortly after birth. Specific gravity (SpG) adjusted concentrations of phthalate metabolites in first trimester urine samples were examined in relation to genital measurements. In boys (N = 366), we obtained two measures of anogenital distance (AGD) (anoscrotal distance, or AGDAS and anopenile distance, AGDAP) as well as penile width (PW). In girls (N = 373), we measured anofourchette distance (AGDAF) and anoclitoral distance (AGDAC). We used multivariable regression models that adjusted for the infant's age at exam, gestational age, weight-for-length Z-score, time of day of urine collection, maternal age and study center. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Three metabolites of DEHP were significantly and inversely associated with both measures of boys' AGD. Associations (β, 95% confidence interval (CI)) between AGDAS and (log10) SpG-adjusted phthalate concentrations were: -1.12 (-2.16, -0.07) for mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP), -1.43, (-2.49, -0.38) for mono-2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl phthalate (MEOHP), and -1.28 (-2.29, -0.27) for mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl (MEHHP). Associations were of similar magnitude for AGDAP. Associations were weaker and not statistically significant for PW. No other phthalate metabolites were associated with any genital measurement in boys. No phthalate metabolites were associated with either AGD measure in girls. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Exposure assessment was based on a single first trimester urine sample, which may have introduced exposure misclassification. In addition, significant between-center differences suggest that this measurement is difficult to standardize. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our findings are consistent with multiple rodent studies and most human studies which were far smaller. The data we report here suggest that even at current low levels, environmental exposure to DEHP can adversely affect male genital development resulting in reproductive tract changes that may impact reproductive health later in life. These findings have important implications for public policy since most pregnant women are exposed to this ubiquitous chemical. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Funding for TIDES was provided by the following grants from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences: R01ES016863-04 and R01 ES016863-02S4. The authors report no conflict of interest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Decrease in anogenital distance among male infants with prenatal phthalate exposure
Swan, S. H., Main, K. M., Liu, F., Stewart, S. L., Kruse, R. L., Calafat, A. M., Mao, C. S., Redmon, J. B., Ternand, C. L., Sullivan, S., et al. (2005) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.8100 · Cited by 1,586
Self-citationGray, L. E. (2000) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/58.2.350 · Cited by 1,084
Welsh, M., Saunders, P. T. K., Fisken, M., Scott, H. M., Hutchison, G. R., Smith, L. B., & Sharpe, R. M. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci34241 · Cited by 781 · cited 2×
“Urine samples were collected during the first trimester (mean gestational age 11 weeks), corresponding to the male programming window for genital development (Welsh et al., 2008).”
The Relationship Between Anogenital Distance and Reproductive Hormone Levels in Adult Men
Eisenberg, M. L., Jensen, T. K., Walters, R. C., Skakkebaek, N. E., & Lipshultz, L. I. (2012) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.041 · Cited by 141
Cited by
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Implications for human health
Kahn, L. G., Philippat, C., Nakayama, S. F., Slama, R., & Trasande, L. (2020) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(20)30129-7 · Cited by 797
Toxic Effects of Di-2-ethylhexyl Phthalate: An Overview
Rowdhwal, S. S. S., & Chen, J. (2018) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2018/1750368 · Cited by 456
Radke, E. G., Braun, J. M., Meeker, J. D., & Cooper, G. S. (2018) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.029 · Cited by 439
Phthalate exposure and long-term epigenomic consequences: a review
Dutta, S., Haggerty, D. K., Rappolee, D. A., & Ruden, D. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.00405 · Cited by 212
Before the beginning: environmental exposures and reproductive and obstetrical outcomes
Segal, T. R., & Giudice, L. C. (2019) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.08.001 · Cited by 173
Metadata
- Authors
- Swan, S. H., Sathyanarayana, S., Barrett, E. S., Janssen, S., Liu, F., Nguyen, R. H. N., Redmon, J. B., the TIDES Study Team, the TIDES Study Team, Liu, F., Scher, E., Stasenko, M., Ayash, E., Schirmer, M., Farrell, J., Thiet, M.-P., Baskin, L., Gray Chelsea Georgesen, H. L., Rody, B. J., Terrell, C. A., Kaur, K., Brantley, E., Fiore, H., Kochman, L., Parlett, L., Marino, J., Hulbert, W., Mevorach, R., Pressman, E., Ivicek, K., Salveson, B., & Alcedo, G.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-02-18
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 963-972
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2096248684
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 22.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First trimester phthalate exposure and anogenital distance in newborns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/deu363
- The paper
- Swan, S. H., Sathyanarayana, S., Barrett, E. S., Janssen, S., Liu, F., Nguyen, R. H. N., Redmon, J. B., the TIDES Study Team, the TIDES Study Team, Liu, F., Scher, E., Stasenko, M., Ayash, E., Schirmer, M., Farrell, J., Thiet, M.-P., Baskin, L., Gray Chelsea Georgesen, H. L., Rody, B. J., . . . Alcedo, G. (2015). First trimester phthalate exposure and anogenital distance in newborns. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.