The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sub-optimal responders following controlled ovarian stimulation: an overlooked group?
Abstract
Individualization of IVF treatment and tailored stimulation based on predicted ovarian response may maximize treatment success and minimize the risks following IVF. Whilst there has been a consensus in defining poor ovarian response and an attempt to elucidate the threshold for excessive ovarian response based on the number of oocytes retrieved following ovarian stimulation, no systematic effort has been made in order to refine the oocyte yield thresholds for a normal responder. In this opinion article we discuss the evidence behind the oocyte number thresholds for the ovarian response categories and present the rationale and merits in recognizing a new, overlooked, ovarian response group: The sub-optimal ovarian responders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Ovarian responsiveness is crucial for the success of IVF (Polyzos and Sunkara, 2015) and, according to Sugita et al. (2013), the decrease in ovarian reserve may not be limited to the immediate post-operative period because of removal of ovarian cortex but may be progressive with time based on different pathogenic mechanisms.”
From When more is not better: 10 ‘don’ts’ in endometriosis management. An ETIC* position statement (2019) · cites this paper as Polyzos and Sunkara, 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ferraretti, A. P., La Marca, A., Fauser, B. C. J. M., Tarlatzis, B., Nargund, G., Gianaroli, L., & on behalf of the ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der092 · Cited by 1,882
Sunkara, S. K., Rittenberg, V., Raine-Fenning, N., Bhattacharya, S., Zamora, J., & Coomarasamy, A. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der106 · Cited by 924
Self-citationBaart, E. B., Martini, E., Eijkemans, M. J., Van Opstal, D., Beckers, N. G. M., Verhoeff, A., Macklon, N. S., & Fauser, B. C. J. M. (2007) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/del484 · Cited by 609
An OHSS-Free Clinic by segmentation of IVF treatment
Devroey, P., Polyzos, N. P., & Blockeel, C. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der251 · Cited by 514
Self-citationTrounson, A. O., Leeton, J. F., Wood, C., Webb, J., & Wood, J. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7221557 · Cited by 379
Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and meta-analysis
van Loendersloot, L. L., van Wely, M., Limpens, J., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Repping, S., & van der Veen, F. (2010) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmq015 · Cited by 338
Steward, R. G., Lan, L., Shah, A. A., Yeh, J. S., Price, T. M., Goldfarb, J. M., & Muasher, S. J. (2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.026 · Cited by 336
Optimum number of oocytes for a successful first IVF treatment cycle
van der Gaast, M., Eijkemans, M., van der Net, J., de Boer, E., Burger, C., van Leeuwen, F., Fauser, B., & Macklon, N. (2006) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60633-5 · Cited by 229
Polyzos, N. P., & Devroey, P. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.048 · Cited by 227
Self-citationVerberg, M. F. G., Eijkemans, M. J. C., Macklon, N. S., Heijnen, E. M. E. W., Baart, E. B., Hohmann, F. P., Fauser, B. C. J. M., & Broekmans, F. J. (2008) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn053 · Cited by 221
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hamoda, 2010, Outcome of fresh IVF/ICSI cycles in relation to the number of oocytes collected: a review of 4,701 treatment cycles, Hum Reprod, 25, 147
Cited by
Drakopoulos, P., Blockeel, C., Stoop, D., Camus, M., de Vos, M., Tournaye, H., & Polyzos, N. P. (2016) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dev316 · Cited by 384
Self-citationEsteves, S. C., Roque, M., Bedoschi, G., Conforti, A., Humaidan, P., & Alviggi, C. (2018) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2018.00461 · Cited by 165
What is new in the management of poor ovarian response in IVF?
Vaiarelli, A., Cimadomo, D., Ubaldi, N., Rienzi, L. F., & Ubaldi, F. M. (2018) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/gco.0000000000000452 · Cited by 148
Humaidan, P., Chin, W., Rogoff, D., D’Hooghe, T., Longobardi, S., Hubbard, J., & Schertz, J. C. (2017) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dew360 · Cited by 108
Humaidan, P., Chin, W., Rogoff, D., D’Hooghe, T., Longobardi, S., Hubbard, J., & Schertz, J. C. (2017) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dex208 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Polyzos, N. P., & Sunkara, S. K.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Polyzos, N.P.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-07-21
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2005-2008
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2101104610
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 8.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Keywords
- controlled ovarian stimulation, poor ovarian response, oocyte retrieval
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cell Count, Female, Humans, Oocytes, Ovulation Induction, Reference Values, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
