Cited by 51Reproductive Biology and FertilityOvarian function and disordersRenin-Angiotensin System Studies

Angiotensin-(1–7) in human follicular fluid correlates with oocyte maturation

Cavallo, Ines K., Dela Cruz, Cynthia, Oliveira, Marilene L., Del Puerto, Helen L., Dias, Júlia A., Lobach, Veronica N., Casalechi, Maíra, Camargos, Maria G. +3 more·2017·Human Reproduction

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Do angiotensin (Ang)-(1-7) levels in human ovarian follicular fluid (FF) correlate with the number and proportion of mature oocytes obtained for IVF? SUMMARY ANSWER: The present study shows for the first time that Ang-(1-7) levels in human FF correlate with the proportion of mature oocytes collected upon ovarian stimulation for IVF. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Ang-(1-7) is an active peptide of the renin-angiotensin system that stimulates oocyte maturation in isolated rabbit and rat ovaries. However, its role in human ovulation remains unexplored. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a prospective cohort study including 64 participants from a single IVF center. Sample size was calculated to achieve a statistical power of 80% in detecting 20% differences in the proportion of mature oocytes between groups. The participants were enrolled in the study during six consecutive months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Plasma samples were obtained from all subjects at Day 21 of the last menstrual cycle before starting pituitary blockade and controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). Plasma and FF samples were quickly mixed with a protease inhibitor cocktail and stored at -80°C. Ang-(1-7) was quantified in plasma and FF samples by a highly sensitive and specific radioimmunoassay, which was preceded by solid phase extraction, speed vacuum concentration and sample reconstitution in assay buffer. FF Ang-(1-7) levels were stratified into tertiles and the patients of each tertile were compared for COS/IVF outcomes using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA. Multiple regression analysis was used to adjust correlations for potential confounders. The mRNA encoding for Mas, a receptor for Ang-(1-7), was investigated by real-time PCR in luteinized granulosa cells purified from the FF. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There was a four-fold increase in plasma Ang-(1-7) after ovulation induction (median 160.9 vs 41.4 pg/ml, P < 0.0001). FF Ang-(1-7) levels were similar to (169.9 pg/ml) but did not correlate with plasma Ang-(1-7) levels (r = -0.05, P = 0.665). Patients at the highest FF Ang-(1-7) tertile had a higher proportion of mature oocytes compared to patients at the lower FF Ang-(1-7) tertile (median 100% vs 70%, P < 0.01). There was a linear correlation between FF Ang-(1-7) and the proportion of mature oocytes (r = 0.380, P < 0.01), which remained significant after adjustment for age and duration of infertility (r = 0.447, P < 0.001). The luteinized granulosa cells expressed Mas receptor mRNA, which was positively correlated to the number of mature oocytes in women with more than three mature oocytes retrieved (r = 0.42, P < 0.01). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This is an observational study, therefore, no causal relationship can be established between Ang-(1-7) and human oocyte maturation. Mas protein expression was not quantified due to limited availability of granulosa cells. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Since this peptide promotes oocyte maturation in other species, it deserves further investigation as a potential maturation factor to human oocytes. STUDY FUNDING AND COMPETING INTEREST(S): Research supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG). The authors have nothing to disclose.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/dex072

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cavallo, I. K., Dela Cruz, C., Oliveira, M. L., Del Puerto, H. L., Dias, J. A., Lobach, V. N., Casalechi, M., Camargos, M. G., Reis, A. M., Santos, R. A., & Reis, F. M.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Corresponding author
Reis, Fernando M.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2017-04-10
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
1318-1324
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2606500543
Cited by
51
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
Keywords
angiotensin-(1-7), follicular fluid, oocyte maturation, controlled ovarian stimulation, IVF outcomes, Mas receptor, luteinized granulosa cells, renin-angiotensin system, ovulation induction
MeSH terms
Adult, Angiotensin I, Blastocyst, Family Characteristics, Female, Fertility Agents, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Infertility, Female, Infertility, Male, Male, Oogenesis, Ovulation Induction, Peptide Fragments, Prospective Studies, Radioimmunoassay, Cohort Studies, Follicular Fluid, Up-Regulation, Solid Phase Extraction, Oocyte Retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review