The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The incidence and origin of segmental aneuploidy in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos
Open accessAbstract
STUDY QUESTION: What is the incidence, origin and clinical significance of segmental aneuploidy in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos? SUMMARY ANSWER: Segmental aneuploidy occurs at a considerable frequency in preimplantation embryos with a majority being mitotic in origin. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In recent years, accurate techniques for the detection of aneuploidy in single cells have been developed. Research using such methods has confirmed that aneuploidy is a common feature of human oocytes and preimplantation embryos. However, thus far research has mainly focused on loss or gain of whole chromosomes. We utilized sensitive molecular methods to study another important form of cytogenetic abnormality at the earliest stages of human development, namely segmental aneuploidy. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Chromosomal copy number data was obtained from oocytes and embryos of 635 IVF patients, who requested chromosome screening for various reasons, most commonly for advanced maternal age or previously unsuccessful IVF treatments. A total of 3541 samples comprising of 452 human oocytes, 1762 cleavage stage and 1327 blastocyst stage embryos were investigated in the present study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Whole genome amplification (Sureplex, Illumina) was performed on cells biopsied from oocytes and embryos of IVF patients who requested chromosome screening. The samples were subsequently processed and analyzed for their chromosome complement using microarray comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), (Illumina, Cambridge, UK). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Segmental abnormalities, involving loss or gain of chromosomal fragments in excess of 15 Mb, were found to occur at a high frequency. The incidence of such abnormalities was 10.4% in oocytes, but this increased dramatically during the first 3 days of embryonic development (24.3%), before starting to decline as embryos reached the final (blastocyst) stage of preimplantation development (15.6%). While some segmental errors were clearly of meiotic origin, most appear to arise during the first few mitoses following fertilization. The reduction in frequency at the blastocyst stage suggests that many cells/embryos affected by segmental abnormalities are eliminated (e.g. via arrest of the affected embryos or apoptosis of abnormal cells). Interestingly, sites of chromosome breakage associated with segmental aneuploidy were not entirely random but tended to occur within distinct chromosomal regions. Some of the identified hotspots correspond to known fragile sites while others may be considered novel and may be specific to gametogenesis and/or embryogenesis. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The cytogenetic analysis was performed on biopsies of embryos, which might not be representative of the true incidence of mosaic segmental aneuploidy of the entire embryo. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The findings of this study are valuable for understanding the origin of subchromosomal duplications and deletions, a clinically important class of abnormalities that are a common cause of congenital abnormalities and miscarriage. Furthermore, the results provide additional evidence that control of the cell cycle is more relaxed during the first few mitotic divisions following fertilization, permitting DNA double-strand breaks to occur and persist through cell division. The data are also of great relevance for preimplantation genetic testing, where the detection of segmental aneuploidy is currently considered problematic for embryo diagnosis and patient counseling. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by institutional funding (Reprogenetics UK). Additionally, DW is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre Programme. DB was supported by the University of Oxford's Clarendon funding. No conflict of interests to declare.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Chromosome instability, including whole or segmental chromosome gain or loss, is common in human preimplantation embryos (27,28).”
From Frequent loss of heterozygosity in CRISPR-Cas9–edited early human embryos (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Following this, chromosomal anomalies are likely to become increasingly detrimental to cellular viability, although a degree of tolerance may persist in trophectoderm cells (28).”
From Frequent loss of heterozygosity in CRISPR-Cas9–edited early human embryos (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role of oxidative stress in female reproduction
Agarwal, A., Gupta, S., & Sharma, R. K. (2005) · Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/1477-7827-3-28 · Cited by 1,729
Braude, P., Bolton, V. N., & Moore, S. S. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/332459a0 · Cited by 1,462
Franasiak, J. M., Forman, E. J., Hong, K. H., Werner, M. D., Upham, K. M., Treff, N. R., & Scott, R. T. (2013) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.004 · Cited by 1,067
Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem
Nagaoka, S. I., Hassold, T. J., & Hunt, P. A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3245 · Cited by 1,036
Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos
Vanneste, E., Voet, T., Le Caignec, C., Ampe, M., Konings, P., Melotte, C., Debrock, S., Amyere, M., Vikkula, M., Schuit, F., et al. (2009) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.1924 · Cited by 880
Munné, S., Alikani, M., Tomkin, G., GRIFO, J. A., & Cohen, J. (1995) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57739-5 · Cited by 849
Sources of DNA Double-Strand Breaks and Models of Recombinational DNA RepairPreprint
Mehta, A., & Haber, J. E. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016428 · Cited by 792
Durkin, S. G., & Glover, T. W. (2007) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.41.042007.165900 · Cited by 734
Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility
Spanò, M., Bonde, J. ., Hjøllund, N. H., Kolstad, H. A., Cordelli, E., & Leter, G. (2000) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00462-8 · Cited by 719
Warburton, D. (1991) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 673
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–142 of 142
Non-Invasive Chromosome Screening for Embryo Preimplantation Using Cell-Free DNA
Huang, J., Yao, Y., Zhou, Y., Jia, J., Wang, J., Ren, J., Liu, P., & Lü, S. (2021) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.98416 · Cited by 3
Biopsy vs comprehensive embryo/blastocyst analysis: a closer look at embryonic chromosome evaluation
Xu, J., Chen, Z., Li, M., & Sun, L. (2025) · Human Reproduction Open · doi:10.1093/hropen/hoaf013 · Cited by 3
Ceschin, I. I., Ceschin, A. P., Joya, M. S., Mitsugi, T., Nishikawa, L. K. S., Krepischi, A. C. V., & Okamoto, O. K. (2022) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.11.020 · Cited by 3
Yao, Z., Wang, X., Zeng, J., Zhao, J., Xia, Q., Zhang, L., Wu, L., & Li, Y. (2022) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.12.024 · Cited by 3
Liu, Y., Shen, J., Zhang, Y., Peng, R., Zhao, J., Zhou, P., Rujing, Y., & Guan, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.1080843 · Cited by 3
Evaluation of guide-free Cas9-induced genomic damage and transcriptome changes in pig embryos
Ge, W., Zhao, X., Gou, S., Jin, Q., Chen, F., Ouyang, Z., Lai, C., Cui, T., Mai, B., Lü, S., et al. (2023) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2023.102035 · Cited by 3
Assessing the necessity of screening ≤5 Mb segmental aneuploidy in routine PGT for aneuploidies
Zhang, J., Qin, M. H., Ma, M., Li, H., Wang, N., Zhu, X., Yan, L., Qiao, J., & Yan, Z. (2024) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.103991 · Cited by 3
Preimplantation Genetic Testing
Yatsenko, S. A., & Rajkovic, A. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-53094-1.00015-1 · Cited by 3
Advances in Developmental Genetics and Achievements in Assisted Reproductive Technology
Баранов, В. С., Kogan, I. Y., & Kuznetzova, T. V. (2019) · Russian Journal of Genetics · doi:10.1134/s1022795419100028 · Cited by 2
Cuman, C., Green, M. P., Willats, E., Hardy, T., & Zander‐Fox, D. (2023) · Fertility & Reproduction · doi:10.1142/s2661318224500026 · Cited by 1
Re-biopsy and modified biopsy in mosaic human embryos with simple segmental chromosomal deletion
Wang, W., Liu, B., Jin, Z.-P., Chen, F., Wang, X., Xiang, Y., Shang, W. H., & Chuai, Y. (2025) · Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/s12958-025-01491-z · Cited by 1
Navigating uncertainty in PGT-A: aligning analytical, biological, and clinical evidence
Popovic, M., Miguel-Escalada, I., Mounts, E. L., Scott, R., & Jalas, C. (2026) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deag015 · Cited by 2
Developmental tolerance and disease implications of aneuploidy
Fusari, E., & Milán, M. (2026) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.01.056 · Cited by 1
Maternal genetic variants associated with aneuploid conception: a narrative review
Ha, S., Liu, W., Yuan, P., Yuan, S., Cao, C., Meng, A., & Chen, H. (2026) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmag012 · Cited by 1
Turocy, J. M., Jerabek, S., Hur, W., Kim, J., Xu, S., Zhao, Q., Xu, J. L., Robles, A., Liu, X., Treff, N. R., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73891-7 · Cited by 2
Lee, T., Diana, T. A. I. N., Chang, T.-C. A., Rose, R., Mantravadi, K. C., Nguyen, L. T. T., Chung, M. K., Malhotra, K., Ezoe, K., Liow, S., et al. (2026) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105844 · Cited by 1
Savostina, G. V., Perminova, P. S. G., Timofeeva, A. V., & Veyukova, M. A. (2021) · Doctor Ru · doi:10.31550/1727-2378-2021-20-8-12-18 · Cited by 1
Kuliev, A., Rechitsky, S., & Simpson, J. L. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43157-0_6 · Cited by 1
Reply: Careful and expert interpretation of PGT-A data can resolve the mosaicism dilemma
Lawrenz, B., Elkhatib, I., & Fatemi, H. M. (2019) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dez176
Liu, X., Xu, C., HUANG, H., & Chen, S.-C. (2020) · Scientia Sinica Vitae · doi:10.1360/ssv-2019-0303
Niu, X., Lao, Y., Sun, Y., & Wang, W. (2021) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.95457
Yao, Z., Wang, X., Zeng, J., Zhao, J., Xia, Q., Zhang, L., Wu, L., & Li, Y. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-364582/v1
Evaluating chromosomal segregation in a family where both spouses carry an autosomal translocation
Puppo, I. L., Tonyan, Z. N., Saifitdinova, A. F., Loginova, J. A., Kinunen, A. A., Panina, A. N., Pastuhova, J. R., Леонтьева, О. А., Chiryaeva, O. G., Malysheva, O. V., et al. (2022) · Reproductive and Developmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/rd9.0000000000000041
Not All Chromosomes Are Created Equal
Klaasen, S. J. (2022) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · doi:10.33540/1607
(2021) · American Registry of PathologyArlington, Virginia eBooks · doi:10.55418/9781933477091-ch09
Preimplantation genetic testing
Chamayou, S. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-89907-9.00011-9
Gunes, S. O., & Garrido, N. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55337-0_11
Genome-wide epigenetic changes in compartments of genetically unbalanced human blastocysts
Tikhonov, A. V., Krapivin, M. I., Malysheva, O. V., Koltsova, A. S., Komarova, E. M., Golubeva, A. V., Efimova, O. A., & Pendina, A. A. (2024) · Ecological genetics · doi:10.17816/ecogen631776
Strawbridge, S. E., Bates, L. E., Ross, C., Jones, K. A., Azami, T., Lohoff, T., Paramor, M., Murray, V., Cidral, A. L., Clarke, J., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.06.02.657331
Ye, Y., Ma, J., Zhan, Q., Zhao, R., Yang, X., Zou, Y., & Jin, F. (2025) · Archives of Medical Research · doi:10.1016/j.arcmed.2025.103318
Kubar, E., Peker, A., Oflaz, İ., Parıltay, E., Solmaz, A. E., Akın, H., & Karaca, E. (2025) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-025-03698-w
Additional file 2 of Chromosomal analysis of 262 miscarried conceptuses: a retrospective study
Gui, J., Ding, J., Yin, T., Liu, Q., Xie, Q., & Ming, L. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21756662
Additional file 1 of Chromosomal analysis of 262 miscarried conceptuses: a retrospective study
Gui, J., Ding, J., Yin, T., Liu, Q., Xie, Q., & Ming, L. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21756659
Jiang, W., Hu, Z., Han, Y., Shi, J., Chen, K., Lian, Y., Li, W., Hao, P., Zhou, Z., Wu, Z., et al. (2026) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-025-08283-1
An Updated Understanding of Human Embryonic Fragmentation
Yao, M., Yang, K., Yin, L., & Ma, T. (2026) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43032-026-02122-7
Hashimi, B. A., Macklon, N., Ahuja, K., Linara-Demakakou, E., Raikundalia, B., SenGupta, S. B., Gordon, T., & Griffin, D. K. (2026) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2026.06.011
Chen, C., Shi, H., Bao, X., & Sun, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2026.1901424
Viotti, M., Madjunkova, S., Besser, A. G., Spinella, F., Stock-Myer, S. E., Homer, H. A., Roman, I., Yakovlev, P., Kornilov, N. I., Wechsberg, C., et al. (2026) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2026.08.1124
Clustered Regularly Interspaced Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) Applied to Gametes and Embryos
Ishanzadeh, M. C. S., & Wells, D. (2026) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-5292-3_24
Self-citationde Quadros, E., Quadros, L., Kann, J., & Bian, M. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.117766
Metadata
- Authors
- Babariya, D., Fragouli, E., Alfarawati, S., Spath, K., & Wells, D.
- Affiliations
- John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Babariya, D
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-11-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2549-2560
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2767736649
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 13.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- University of Oxford
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Keywords
- segmental aneuploidy, human oocytes, preimplantation embryo, meiotic aneuploidy, embryonic development, blastocyst, embryo biopsy, embryo selection, advanced maternal age, in vitro fertilization, implantation outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aneuploidy, Biopsy, Blastocyst, Chromosomes, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Karyotyping, Male, Maternal Age, Middle Aged, Mitosis, Oocytes, Pregnancy, Reproducibility of Results, Incidence, Preimplantation Diagnosis, Chromosome Disorders, Embryonic Development, Comparative Genomic Hybridization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
