The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fibroids and female reproduction: a critical analysis of the evidence
Abstract
Observational epidemiological studies aimed at elucidating the relationship between fibroids and infertility are inconclusive due to methodological limitations. However, two main pieces of clinical evidence support the opinion that the fibroids interfere with fertility. First, in IVF cycles, the delivery rate is reduced in patients with fibroids but is not affected in patients who have undergone myomectomy. Second, even if randomized studies are lacking, surgical treatment appears to increase the pregnancy rate: approximately 50% women who undergo myomectomy for infertility, subsequently conceive. Available evidence also suggests that submucosal, intramural and subserosal fibroids interfere with fertility in decreasing order of importance. Although more limited, some data supports an impact of the number and dimension of the lesions. Drawing clear guidelines for the management of fibroids in infertile women is difficult due to the lack of large randomized trials aimed at elucidating which patients may benefit from surgery. At present, physicians should pursue a comprehensive and personalized approach clearly exposing the pros and cons of myomectomy to the patient, including the risks associated with fibroids during pregnancy on one hand, and those associated with surgery on the other hand.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adenomyosis, epidemiological factors
Vercellini, P., Viganò, P., Somigliana, E., Daguati, R., Abbiati, A., & Fedele, L. (2006) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.017 · Cited by 319
Self-citationAromatase in endometriosis and uterine leiomyomata
Bulun, S. E., Imir, G., Utsunomiya, H., Thung, S., Gurates, B., Tamura, M., & Lin, Z. (2005) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.04.012 · Cited by 154
Cited by
Uterine fibroid management: From the present to the future
Donnez, J., & Dolmans, M.-M. (2016) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmw023 · Cited by 780
Hooker, A. B., Lemmers, M., Thurkow, A. L., Heymans, M. W., Opmeer, B. C., Brolmann, H. A. M., Mol, B. W., & Huirne, J. A. F. (2014) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmt045 · Cited by 478
Uterine fibroids: current perspectives
Khan, A., Shehmar, M., & Gupta, J. (2014) · International Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.2147/ijwh.s51083 · Cited by 406
Vannuccini, S., Clifton, V. L., Fraser, I. S., Taylor, H. S., Critchley, H., Giudice, L. C., & Petraglia, F. (2016) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv044 · Cited by 379
Hysteroscopic myomectomy: a comprehensive review of surgical techniques
Di Spiezio Sardo, A., Mazzon, I., Bramante, S., Bettocchi, S., Bifulco, G., Guida, M., & Nappi, C. (2008) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmm041 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Somigliana, E., Vercellini, P., Daguati, R., Pasin, R., De Giorgi, O., & Crosignani, P. G.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction Update
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-06-21
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 465-476
- ISSN
- 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2369
- OpenAlex
- W2167928742
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fibroids and female reproduction: a critical analysis of the evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humupd/dmm013
- The paper
- Somigliana, E., Vercellini, P., Daguati, R., Pasin, R., De Giorgi, O., & Crosignani, P. G. (2007). Fibroids and female reproduction: a critical analysis of the evidence. Human Reproduction Update. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmm013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.