Meiosis in oocytes: predisposition to aneuploidy and its increased incidence with age
Open accessAbstract
Mammalian oocytes begin meiosis in the fetal ovary, but only complete it when fertilized in the adult reproductive tract. This review examines the cell biology of this protracted process: from entry of primordial germ cells into meiosis to conception. The defining feature of meiosis is two consecutive cell divisions (meiosis I and II) and two cell cycle arrests: at the germinal vesicle (GV), dictyate stage of prophase I and at metaphase II. These arrests are spanned by three key events, the focus of this review: (i) passage from mitosis to GV arrest during fetal life, regulated by retinoic acid; (ii) passage through meiosis I and (iii) completion of meiosis II following fertilization, both meiotic divisions being regulated by cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK1) activity. Meiosis I in human oocytes is associated with an age-related high rate of chromosomal mis-segregation, such as trisomy 21 (Down's syndrome), resulting in aneuploid conceptuses. Although aneuploidy is likely to be multifactorial, oocytes from older women may be predisposed to be becoming aneuploid as a consequence of an age-long decline in the cohesive ties holding chromosomes together. Such loss goes undetected by the oocyte during meiosis I either because its ability to respond and block division also deteriorates with age, or as a consequence of being inherently unable to respond to the types of segregation defects induced by cohesion loss.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Advancing maternal age is a known risk factor for chromosomal aberrations.
“but advancing maternal age is a known risk factor for chromosomal aberrations (45).”
From Genetics and genomics of autism spectrum disorder: embracing complexity (2015) · cites this paper as [45]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 275 · Cited by 228
- Authors
- Jones, K. T.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Keith T.
- ORCID
- Jones, Keith T.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction Update
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-12-14
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-158
- ISSN
- 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2369
- OpenAlex
- W2145155061
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 275
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Human Reproduction Update (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
- Keywords
- meiosis, oocytes, aneuploidy, maternal age, Down syndrome, chromosome segregation, meiotic arrest, retinoic acid, CDK1, cohesion loss, prophase I, germinal vesicle arrest, metaphase II arrest, primordial germ cells, meiosis I
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Aneuploidy, Animals, Female, Fertilization, Humans, Meiosis, Mitosis, Oocytes, Incidence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review