The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The patients' perspective on fertility care: a systematic review
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient-centered reproductive medicine (PCRM) is important for quality of care, and this is increasingly being recognized. However, its scientific basis is unclear. The main research questions addressed in this review are: 'How has the patients' perspective on fertility care been examined (method and quality)?' and 'What is the perspective of patients in developed countries on fertility care?'. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted and inclusion criteria with respect to eligibility and quality were applied. The methodology of the studies was critically appraised; the findings of the studies were synthesized and organized according to: patients' value clarification and assessment of service quality and dimensions of patient-centeredness. Additionally data on patient preferences and determinants of patients' perspective on care were collected. RESULTS: In 51 selected studies, patients' perspective on fertility care was examined with (few or many item) questionnaires and/or qualitative interviews. Significant methodological problems were observed. Fertility patients attached importance to seven out of eight dimensions of patient-centeredness (Picker institute) and two new dimensions 'fertility clinic staff' and 'skills' were developed. Overall, fertility patients want to be treated like human beings with a need for: medical skills, respect, coordination, accessibility, information, comfort, support, partner involvement and a good attitude of and relationship with fertility clinic staff. Patients' preferences between procedures and demographic, medical and psychological determinants of their perspective were defined. CONCLUSIONS: Fertility patients have 'human needs' besides their need for medical care. Evidence on PCRM is available but significant methodological limitations call for the development and validation of a European questionnaire.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What do women want? Women's experiences of infertility treatment
Malin, M., Hemminki, E., Räikkönen, O., Sihvo, S., & Perälä, M.-L. (2001) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00317-8 · Cited by 135
Online psychoeducational support for infertile women: a randomized controlled trial
Cousineau, T. M., Green, T. C., Corsini, E., Seibring, A., Showstack, M. T., Applegarth, L., Davidson, M., & Perloe, M. (2008) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dem306 · Cited by 127
Porter, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2008) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dem398 · Cited by 79
Cited by
The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties†
Boivin, J., Takefman, J., & Braverman, A. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der171 · Cited by 478
Gameiro, S., Boivin, J., Peronace, L., & Verhaak, C. M. (2012) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dms031 · Cited by 459
Pedro, J., Brandão, T., Schmidt, L., Costa, M. E., & Martins, M. V. (2018) · Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.1080/03009734.2018.1480186 · Cited by 263
Almeida, M., Ramos, C., Maciel, L., Basto-Pereira, M., & Leal, I. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.995981 · Cited by 81
Gameiro, S., Boivin, J., & Domar, A. (2013) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.015 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Dancet, E. A. F., Nelen, W. L. D. M., Sermeus, W., De Leeuw, L., Kremer, J. A. M., & D'Hooghe, T. M.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction Update
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-03-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 467-487
- ISSN
- 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2369
- OpenAlex
- W2130975929
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The patients' perspective on fertility care: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humupd/dmq004
- The paper
- Dancet, E. A. F., Nelen, W. L. D. M., Sermeus, W., De Leeuw, L., Kremer, J. A. M., & D'Hooghe, T. M. (2010). The patients' perspective on fertility care: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmq004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.