The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Chances of achieving parenthood are high for couples who undergo fertility treatment. However, many choose to discontinue before conceiving. A systematic review was conducted to investigate patients' stated reasons for and predictors of discontinuation at five fertility treatment stages. METHODS Six databases were systematically searched. Search-terms referred to fertility treatment and discontinuation. Studies reporting on patients' stated reasons for or predictors of treatment discontinuation were included. A list of all reasons for discontinuation presented in each study was made, different categories of reasons were defined and the percentage of selections of each category was calculated. For each predictor, it was noted how many studies investigated it and how many found a positive and/or negative association with discontinuation. RESULTS The review included 22 studies that sampled 21 453 patients from eight countries. The most selected reasons for discontinuation were: postponement of treatment (39.18%, postponement of treatment or unknown 19.17%), physical and psychological burden (19.07%, psychological burden 14%, physical burden 6.32%), relational and personal problems (16.67%, personal reasons 9.27%, relational problems 8.83%), treatment rejection (13.23%) and organizational (11.68%) and clinic (7.71%) problems. Some reasons were common across stages (e.g. psychological burden). Others were stage-specific (e.g. treatment rejection during workup). None of the predictors reported were consistently associated with discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS Much longitudinal and theory led research is required to explain discontinuation. Meanwhile, treatment burden should be addressed by better care organization and support for patients. Patients should be well informed, have the opportunity to discuss values and worries about treatment and receive advice to decide about continuing treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 17,633
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads
Spanier, G. B. (1976) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/350547 · Cited by 7,050
Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action
De Geest, S., & Sabaté, E. (2003) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1016/s1474-5151(03)00091-4 · Cited by 6,272
Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods
Newcombe, R. G. (1998) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857::aid-sim777>3.0.co;2-e · Cited by 5,107
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Akyuz, 2009, Reasons for infertile couples to discontinue in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, J Reprod Infant Psychol, 27, 258, 10.1080/02646830802409652 · doi:10.1080/02646830802409652
- Boden, 2007, When IVF treatment fails, Hum Fertil, 10, 93, 10.1080/14647270601142614 · doi:10.1080/14647270601142614
- Danesh-Meyer, 1993, Withdrawal from a donor insemination programme, Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 33, 187, 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1993.tb02390.x · doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.1993.tb02390.x
- De Vries, 1998, Prognostic factors in patients continuing IVF treatment and dropouts, Hum Reprod, 13, S54
- De Vries, 1999, Prognostic factors in patients continuing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment and dropouts, Fertil Steril, 72, 674, 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00334-9 · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00334-9
- Guerif, 2002, Cohort follow-up of couples with primary infertiilty in an ART programme using frozen donor semen, Hum Reprod, 17, 1525, 10.1093/humrep/17.6.1525 · doi:10.1093/humrep/17.6.1525
- Guerif, 2003, Achievement of second parenthood in an ART programme using frozen donor semen: cohort follow-up, Hum Reprod, 18, 1853, 10.1093/humrep/deg380 · doi:10.1093/humrep/deg380
- Kelly, 2006, The hidden costs of IVF, Ir Med J, 99, 142
- Meijer, 1980, De behandelingsresultaten van donorinseminatie, Ned T Geneesk, 124, 587
- National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE), 2004, Fertility: Assessment and Treatment for People with Fertility Problems
- Pearson, 2009, Point of failure as a predictor of in vitro fertilization treatment discontinuation, Fertil Steril, 91, 1483, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1732 · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1732
- Pelinck, 2007, Cumulative pregnancy rates after a maximum of nine cycles of modified natural cycle IVF and analysis of patient drop-out: a cohort study, Hum Reprod, 22, 2463, 10.1093/humrep/dem164 · doi:10.1093/humrep/dem164
- Roest, 1998, Cumulative pregnancy rates and selective drop-out of patients in in-vitro fertilization treatment, Hum Reprod, 13, 339, 10.1093/humrep/13.2.339 · doi:10.1093/humrep/13.2.339
- Rufat, 1994, Évolutions des critères pronostiques de fécondation in vitro selon le rang de la tentative, Contracept Fertil Sex, 22, 282
- Sharma, 2002, Factors influencing the cumulative conception rate and discontinuation of in vitro fertilization treatment for infertility, Fertil Steril, 78, 40, 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03160-6 · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03160-6
- Spranca, 2001, Designing websites to empower health care consumers
- Steures, 2007, Is the a priori prognosis from couples dropping out of an IUI programme different from couples continuing IUI?, Hum Reprod, 22, 366
- van Dongen, 2010, Reasons for dropping out from a waiting list for in vitro fertilization, Fertil Steril, 94, 1713, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.08.066 · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.08.066
- Witsenburg, 2005, Cumulative live birth rates in cohorts of patients treated with in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Fertil Steril, 84, 99, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.013 · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.013
Cited by
Bunting, L., Tsibulsky, I., & Boivin, J. (2013) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/des402 · Cited by 292
Self-citationLi, Y., Zhang, X., Shi, M., Guo, S., & Wang, L. (2019) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-019-1099-8 · Cited by 142
Gameiro, S., Boivin, J., & Domar, A. (2013) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.015 · Cited by 79
Self-citationPreconception lifestyle advice for people with infertility
Boedt, T., Vanhove, A.-C., Vercoe, M. A., Matthys, C., Dancet, E., & Lie Fong, S. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008189.pub3 · Cited by 66
Experiential avoidance, self-compassion, self-judgment and coping styles in infertility
Cunha, M., Galhardo, A., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2016) · Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare · doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2016.04.001 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Gameiro, S., Boivin, J., Peronace, L., & Verhaak, C. M.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction Update
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-08-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 652-669
- ISSN
- 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2369
- OpenAlex
- W2169784490
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 2.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humupd/dms031
- The paper
- Gameiro, S., Boivin, J., Peronace, L., & Verhaak, C. M. (2012). Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment. Human Reproduction Update. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.