Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 662

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BMI in relation to sperm count: an updated systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis

Open access
Sermondade, N., Faure, C., Fezeu, L., Shayeb, A. G., Bonde, J. P., Jensen, T. K., Van Wely, M., Cao, J., Martini, A. C., Eskandar, M., Chavarro, J. E., Koloszar, S., Twigt, J. M., Ramlau-Hansen, C. H., Borges, E., Lotti, F., Steegers-Theunissen, R. P. M., Zorn, B., Polotsky, A. J., La Vignera, S., Eskenazi, B., Tremellen, K., Magnusdottir, E. V., Fejes, I., Hercberg, S., Levy, R., Czernichow, S.·2013·Human Reproduction Update

Abstract

BACKGROUND The global obesity epidemic has paralleled a decrease in semen quality. Yet, the association between obesity and sperm parameters remains controversial. The purpose of this report was to update the evidence on the association between BMI and sperm count through a systematic review with meta-analysis. METHODS A systematic review of available literature (with no language restriction) was performed to investigate the impact of BMI on sperm count. Relevant studies published until June 2012 were identified from a Pubmed and EMBASE search. We also included unpublished data (n = 717 men) obtained from the Infertility Center of Bondy, France. Abstracts of relevant articles were examined and studies that could be included in this review were retrieved. Authors of relevant studies for the meta-analysis were contacted by email and asked to provide standardized data. RESULTS A total of 21 studies were included in the meta-analysis, resulting in a sample of 13 077 men from the general population and attending fertility clinics. Data were stratified according to the total sperm count as normozoospermia, oligozoospermia and azoospermia. Standardized weighted mean differences in sperm concentration did not differ significantly across BMI categories. There was a J-shaped relationship between BMI categories and risk of oligozoospermia or azoospermia. Compared with men of normal weight, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for oligozoospermia or azoospermia was 1.15 (0.93-1.43) for underweight, 1.11 (1.01-1.21) for overweight, 1.28 (1.06-1.55) for obese and 2.04 (1.59-2.62) for morbidly obese men. CONCLUSIONS Overweight and obesity were associated with an increased prevalence of azoospermia or oligozoospermia. The main limitation of this report is that studied populations varied, with men recruited from both the general population and infertile couples. Whether weight normalization could improve sperm parameters should be evaluated further.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humupd/dms050

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 662

Metadata

Authors
Sermondade, N., Faure, C., Fezeu, L., Shayeb, A. G., Bonde, J. P., Jensen, T. K., Van Wely, M., Cao, J., Martini, A. C., Eskandar, M., Chavarro, J. E., Koloszar, S., Twigt, J. M., Ramlau-Hansen, C. H., Borges, E., Lotti, F., Steegers-Theunissen, R. P. M., Zorn, B., Polotsky, A. J., La Vignera, S., Eskenazi, B., Tremellen, K., Magnusdottir, E. V., Fejes, I., Hercberg, S., Levy, R., & Czernichow, S.
Venue
Human Reproduction Update
Published
2012-12-12
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
221-231
ISSN
  • 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2369
OpenAlex
W2124182468
Cited by
662
References
5
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BMI in relation to sperm count: an updated systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humupd/dms050
The paper
Sermondade, N., Faure, C., Fezeu, L., Shayeb, A. G., Bonde, J. P., Jensen, T. K., Van Wely, M., Cao, J., Martini, A. C., Eskandar, M., Chavarro, J. E., Koloszar, S., Twigt, J. M., Ramlau-Hansen, C. H., Borges, E., Lotti, F., Steegers-Theunissen, R. P. M., Zorn, B., Polotsky, A. J., . . . Czernichow, S. (2013). BMI in relation to sperm count: an updated systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms050

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.