Cited by 124Reproductive Health and TechnologiesAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyReproductive Biology and Fertility

The role of seminal plasma for improved outcomes during in vitro fertilization treatment: review of the literature and meta-analysis

Crawford, Giselle, Ray, Arpita, Gudi, Anil, Shah, Amit, Homburg, Roy·2015·Human Reproduction Update

Abstract

Background There is a growing body of evidence surrounding the role played by seminal plasma in human implantation. Seminal fluid contains several proteins that interact with cervical and uterine epithelial cells inducing active immune tolerance. We sought to answer the study question: Does exposure to seminal plasma improve pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing IVF? Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched for via MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, National Research Register, ISI conference proceedings, ISRCTN register and Meta-register, from 1966 to December 2013. Search terms included: 'seminal plasma', 'seminal fluid', 'sexual intercourse', 'IVF', 'ICSI', 'ART', 'pregnancy rate', 'implantation', 'embryo transfer' and 'live birth'. This analysis included all RCTs comparing the outcome of IVF treatments in patients exposed to seminal plasma near the time of oocyte pickup (OPU) or embryo transfer (ET) with that of placebo controls or controls with no exposure to seminal plasma. The main intervention was exposure to seminal plasma around the time of OPU or embryo transfer during an IVF cycle. The main outcomes were clinical pregnancy and live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates. Data were collected by two independent authors and statistically pooled via meta-analysis following intention to treat and per protocol principles using RevMan (v5.2.10). I(2) statistic, forest plots and chi-squared heterogeneity tests were used. Results In total 2204 patients were inc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humupd/dmu052

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In advanced non-small cell lung cancer, Vδ1 γδ T cells and Vδ1-Vδ2- γδ T cells are the main subpopulations of γδ T cells in the lung, and higher levels of intratumoral Vδ1 γδ T cells is a poor prognosis factor.

    “In advanced non-small cell lung cancer, Vδ1 γδ T cells and Vδ1-Vδ2-γδ T cells are the main subpopulations of γδ T cells in the lung, and higher levels of intratumoral Vδ1 γδ T cells is a poor prognosis factor (45).”

    From Comparing Mouse and Human Tissue-Resident γδ T Cells (2022) · cites this paper as [45]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crawford, G., Ray, A., Gudi, A., Shah, A., & Homburg, R.
Affiliations
Homerton University Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Homburg, Roy
Venue
Human Reproduction Update
Published
2014-10-03
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
275-284
ISSN
  • 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2369
OpenAlex
W2006169380
Cited by
124
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction Update (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
seminal plasma, in vitro fertilization, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, embryo transfer, immune tolerance, cervical epithelium, uterine epithelium, assisted reproduction
MeSH terms
Embryo Transfer, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Immune Tolerance, Embryo Implantation, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Semen, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Pregnancy Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review