The DOI matches its Crossref record; 305 of the 305 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transgenerational inheritance: how impacts to the epigenetic and genetic information of parents affect offspring health
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A defining feature of sexual reproduction is the transmission of genomic information from both parents to the offspring. There is now compelling evidence that the inheritance of such genetic information is accompanied by additional epigenetic marks, or stable heritable information that is not accounted for by variations in DNA sequence. The reversible nature of epigenetic marks coupled with multiple rounds of epigenetic reprogramming that erase the majority of existing patterns have made the investigation of this phenomenon challenging. However, continual advances in molecular methods are allowing closer examination of the dynamic alterations to histone composition and DNA methylation patterns that accompany development and, in particular, how these modifications can occur in an individual’s germline and be transmitted to the following generation. While the underlying mechanisms that permit this form of transgenerational inheritance remain unclear, it is increasingly apparent that a combination of genetic and epigenetic modifications plays major roles in determining the phenotypes of individuals and their offspring. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: Information pertaining to transgenerational inheritance was systematically reviewed focusing primarily on mammalian cells to the exclusion of inheritance in plants, due to inherent differences in the means by which information is transmitted between generations. The effects of environmental factors and biological processes on both epigenetic and genetic information were reviewed to determine their contribution to modulating inheritable phenotypes. SEARCH METHODS: Articles indexed in PubMed were searched using keywords related to transgenerational inheritance, epigenetic modifications, paternal and maternal inheritable traits and environmental and biological factors influencing transgenerational modifications. We sought to clarify the role of epigenetic reprogramming events during the life cycle of mammals and provide a comprehensive review of how the genomic and epigenomic make-up of progenitors may determine the phenotype of its descendants. OUTCOMES: We found strong evidence supporting the role of DNA methylation patterns, histone modifications and even non-protein-coding RNA in altering the epigenetic composition of individuals and producing stable epigenetic effects that were transmitted from parents to offspring, in both humans and rodent species. Multiple genomic domains and several histone modification sites were found to resist demethylation and endure genome-wide reprogramming events. Epigenetic modifications integrated into the genome of individuals were shown to modulate gene expression and activity at enhancer and promoter domains, while genetic mutations were shown to alter sequence availability for methylation and histone binding. Fundamentally, alterations to the nuclear composition of the germline in response to environmental factors, ageing, diet and toxicant exposure have the potential to become hereditably transmitted. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: The environment influences the health and well-being of progeny by working through the germline to introduce spontaneous genetic mutations as well as a variety of epigenetic changes, including alterations in DNA methylation status and the post-translational modification of histones. In evolutionary terms, these changes create the phenotypic diversity that fuels the fires of natural selection. However, rather than being adaptive, such variation may also generate a plethora of pathological disease states ranging from dominant genetic disorders to neurological conditions, including spontaneous schizophrenia and autism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mitochondria, Oxidants, and Aging
Balaban, R. S., Nemoto, S., & Finkel, T. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.001 · Cited by 4,388
Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals
Law, J. A., & Jacobsen, S. E. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2719 · Cited by 3,850
Persistent epigenetic differences associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans
Heijmans, B. T., Tobi, E. W., Stein, A. D., Putter, H., Blauw, G. J., Susser, E. S., Slagboom, P. E., & Lumey, L. H. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0806560105 · Cited by 3,082
Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells
Meissner, A., Mikkelsen, T. S., Gu, H., Wernig, M., Hanna, J., Sivachenko, A., Zhang, X., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Jaffe, D. B., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07107 · Cited by 2,536
Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility
Jirtle, R. L., & Skinner, M. K. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2045 · Cited by 2,492
Epigenetics: A landscape takes shape
Goldberg, A. D., Allis, C. D., & Bernstein, E. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.006 · Cited by 2,466
Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome
Reik, W., & Walter, J. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35047554 · Cited by 2,285
Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms
Cedar, H., & Bergman, Y. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2540 · Cited by 2,267
Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father’s age to disease risk
Kong, A., Frigge, M. L., Masson, G., Besenbacher, S., Sulem, P., Magnusson, G., Gudjonsson, S. A., Sigurdsson, A., Jonasdottir, A., Jonasdottir, A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11396 · Cited by 2,134
Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development
Reik, W. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05918 · Cited by 1,963
Cited by
Prenatal Androgen Exposure and Transgenerational Susceptibility to Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Risal, S., Pei, Y., Lu, H., Manti, M., Fornes, R., Pui, H.-P., Zhao, Z., Massart, J., Ohlsson, C., Lindgren, E., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0666-1 · Cited by 356
Maternal Effects as Causes of Risk for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Mahjani, B., Klei, L., Hultman, C. M., Larsson, H., Devlin, B., Buxbaum, J. D., Sandin, S., & Grice, D. E. (2020) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.01.006 · Cited by 36
Guo, T., Hu, Z., Bao, L., Cao, Y., Chu, Z., Wang, M., Li, Y., & Luo, F. (2025) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2025.1680793 · Cited by 7
Al-Salihy, A. A.-R. S. (2024) · Frontiers in Reproductive Health · doi:10.3389/frph.2024.1438049 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Xavier, M. J., Roman, S. D., Aitken, R. J., & Nixon, B.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction Update
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-08-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 519-541
- ISSN
- 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2369
- OpenAlex
- W2965941796
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 305
- FWCI
- 7.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transgenerational inheritance: how impacts to the epigenetic and genetic information of parents affect offspring health. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humupd/dmz017
- The paper
- Xavier, M. J., Roman, S. D., Aitken, R. J., & Nixon, B. (2019). Transgenerational inheritance: how impacts to the epigenetic and genetic information of parents affect offspring health. Human Reproduction Update. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmz017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.