Cited by 2,466Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting

Epigenetics: A landscape takes shape

Open access
Goldberg, Aaron D., Allis, C. David, Bernstein, Emily·2007·Cell

Abstract

Epigenetics has recently evolved from a collection of diverse phenomena to a defined and far-reaching field of study. In this Essay, we examine the epistemology of epigenetics, provide a brief overview of underlying molecular mechanisms, and suggest future challenges for the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.006

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The epigenetic landscape is a platform for interaction of a variety of environmental factors with a complex genetic environment to change gene expression.

    “the term epigenetic landscape is defined as a platform for the interaction of a variety of environmental factors with a complex genetic environment to change the expression of genes [29,30,31].”

    From Revisiting Epigenetics Fundamentals and Its Biomedical Implications (2024) · cites this paper as [29]

    The paper’s Abstract links changes in the “epigenetic landscape” to distinct, stable patterns of gene expression. It does not define that landscape as a platform where environmental factors interact with a complex genetic environment, so that part of the attributed definition is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The generally accepted concept of epigenetics specifies mitotically and/or meiotically heritance and one that does not entail a change in genomic DNA.

    “the generally accepted concept has obtained a more accurate definition as specifying mitotically and/or meiotically heritance and one that does not entail a change in genomic DNA.”

    From Revisiting Epigenetics Fundamentals and Its Biomedical Implications (2024) · cites this paper as [29]

    The definition passage (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) supports the claim that epigenetic changes do not alter the underlying DNA sequence. It describes those changes as potentially stable and *ideally* heritable, however, rather than requiring mitotic or meiotic inheritance as the citing sentence states. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. [1]1. Allis, C.D. ∙ Jenuwein, T. ∙ Reinberg, D. ... (Editors) Epigenetics Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 2007 Google Scholar
  2. [2]2. Bernstein, E. ∙ Allis, C.D. Genes Dev. 2005; 19:1635-1655 Crossref Scopus (518) PubMed Google Scholar
  3. [3]3. Dobosy, J.R. ∙ Selker, E.U. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2001; 58:721-727 Crossref Scopus (170) PubMed Google Scholar
  4. [4]4. Fischle, W. ∙ Tseng, B.S. ∙ Dormann, H.L. ... Nature. 2005; 438:1116-1122 Crossref Scopus (775) PubMed Google Scholar
  5. [5]5. Freitag, M. ∙ Selker, E.U. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2005; 15:191-199 Crossref Scopus (94) Google Scholar
  6. [6]6. Goll, M.G. ∙ Bestor, T.H. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2005; 74:481-514 Crossref Scopus (1693) PubMed Google Scholar
  7. [7]7. Grewal, S.I. ∙ Jia, S. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007; 8:35-46 Crossref Scopus (1059) PubMed Google Scholar
  8. [8]8. Heard, E. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2005; 15:482-489 Crossref Scopus (167) Google Scholar
  9. [9]9. Jenuwein, T. ∙ Allis, C.D. Science. 2001; 293:1074-1080 Crossref Scopus (7984) PubMed Google Scholar
  10. [10]10. Lachner, M. ∙ O'Carroll, D. ∙ Rea, S. ... Nature. 2001; 410:116-120 Crossref Scopus (2266) PubMed Google Scholar
  11. [11]11. Lolle, S.J. ∙ Victor, J.L. ∙ Young, J.M. ... Nature. 2005; 434:505-509 Crossref Scopus (172) Google Scholar
  12. [12]12. Polo, S.E. ∙ Almouzni, G. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2006; 16:104-111 Crossref Scopus (126) Google Scholar
  13. [13]13. Ringrose, L. ∙ Paro, R. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2004; 38:413-443 Crossref Scopus (888) PubMed Google Scholar
  14. [14]14. Ruthenburg, A.J. ∙ Allis, C.D. ∙ Wysocka, J. Mol. Cell. 2007; 25:15-30 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (933) PubMed Google Scholar
  15. [15]15. Schotta, G. ∙ Ebert, A. ∙ Dorn, R. ... Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2003; 14:67-75 Crossref Scopus (173) Google Scholar
  16. [16]16. Smith, C.L. ∙ Peterson, C.L. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2005; 65:115-148 Crossref Scopus (158) PubMed Google Scholar
  17. [17]17. Sparmann, A. ∙ van Lohuizen, M. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2006; 6:846-856 Crossref Scopus (1112) PubMed Google Scholar
  18. [18]18. Waddington, C.H. Endeavour. 1942; 1:18-20 Crossref Scopus (1) Google Scholar
  19. [20]20. Watson, J.D. Sci. Am. 2003; 288:66-69 Crossref Scopus (20) Google Scholar
  20. [21]21. Wysocka, J. ∙ Swigut, T. ∙ Xiao, H. ... Nature. 2006; 442:86-90 Crossref Scopus (940) PubMed Google Scholar

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldberg, A. D., Allis, C. D., & Bernstein, E.
Affiliations
Rockefeller University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Allis, C. David
  • Bernstein, Emily
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
128
Issue
4
Pages
635-638
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130907138
Cited by
2,466
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 151 · 2022: 147 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 147 · 2019: 159 · 2018: 150 · 2017: 166 · 2016: 163 · 2015: 148 · 2014: 150 · 2013: 127 · 2012: 129
FWCI
36.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 07739, T32GM007739)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Keywords
epigenetics, history of epigenetics
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Division, Gene Expression Regulation, Histones, Humans, DNA Methylation, RNA, Untranslated, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review