The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptive peacebuilding
Open accessAbstract
International peacebuilding is experiencing a pragmatic turn. The era of liberal idealism is waning, and in its place new approaches to peacebuilding are emerging. This article identifies one such emerging approach, gives it a name—adaptive peacebuilding—and explores what it may be able to offer peacebuilding once it is more fully developed. It builds on the knowledge generated in the fields of complexity, resilience and local ownership, and may help inform the implementation of the emerging UN concept of sustaining peace. It is an alternative to the determined-design neo-liberal approach that has dominated peacebuilding over the past three decades. It represents an approach where peacebuilders, working closely together with the communities and people affected by conflict, actively engage in structured processes to sustain peace by using an inductive methodology of iterative learning and adaptation. The adaptive peacebuilding approach embraces uncertainty, focuses on processes rather than end-states, and invests in the resilience of local and national institutions to promote change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy: (504012013-001)
Collier, P., Elliot, V. L., Hegre, H., Hoeffler, A., Reynal-Querol, M., & Sambanis, N. (2003) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e504012013-001 · Cited by 2,431
Fixing failed states: a framework for rebuilding a fractured world
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2317 · Cited by 634
Planning With Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy
Healey, P. (2010) · Planning Theory & Practice · doi:10.1080/14649357.2010.525376 · Cited by 355
Boundaries, Hierarchies and Networks in Complex Systems
Cilliers, P. (2001) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1016/s1363-9196(01)00031-2 · Cited by 277
South Sudan: The Untold Story from Independence to Civil War
Johnson, H. (2016) · Cited by 72
Doing Iterative and Adaptive Work
Andrews, M., Pritchett, L. H., & Woolcock, M. J. V. (2016) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- de Coning, C.
- Venue
- International Affairs
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-02-15
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 301-317
- ISSN
- 0020-5850 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2346
- OpenAlex
- W4240531309
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 59.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive peacebuilding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ia/iix251
- The paper
- de Coning, C. (2018). Adaptive peacebuilding. International Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.