CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,431Political Conflict and GovernanceNatural Resources and Economic DevelopmentPeacebuilding and International Security

Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy: (504012013-001)

Collier, Paul, Elliot, V. L., Hegre, Havard, Hoeffler, Anke, Reynal-Querol, Marta, Sambanis, Nicholas·2003·PsycEXTRA Dataset
DOI 10.1037/e504012013-001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

3.5 Modeling the duration of civil war 80 4.1 Recurrent conflicts example 1: Afghanistan 104 4.2 Recurrent conflicts example 2: Angola 105 5.1 A comparison of Botswana and Sierra Leone 127 5.2 Transparency of oil revenues in Chad 131 5.3 The rough diamond trade and the Kimberley process 143 5.4 The Khmer Rouge and the logs of war 145 C O N T E N T S viii 4.8 Development of risk of civil war for the marginalized and successful developers, 2000-2020 103 4.9 The conflict trap: risk of civil war relative to a country with no recent war 106 4.10 The conflict trap by type of country 107 4.11 Risk components for marginalized countries in the conflict trap, relative to the same countries preconflict 107 4.12 The conflict trap in 2000: annual flows into and out of conflict 109 4.13a The conflict trap in 2020: annual flows into and out of conflict 111 4.13b The conflict trap in 2050: annual flows into and out of conflict 111 4.14 The incidence of civil war in South and East Asia and in Oceania, 1950-2001 112 4.15 The incidence of civil war in Latin America and the Caribbean, 1950-2001 113 4.16 The incidence of civil war in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, 1950-2001 113 4.17 The incidence of civil war in the Middle East and North Africa, 1950-2001 114 4.18 The incidence of civil war in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1950-2001 114 4.19 The incidence of civil war in Africa and other developing countries, 1950-2001 115 5.1 The contribution to peace of faster growth in the successful developers 124 5.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/e504012013-001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to Collier et al. (2003), the dire socio-economic consequences of civil violence prepare the ground for renewed conflict by locking countries into a 'conflict trap.'

    “According to Collier et al. (2003), the dire socio-economic consequences of civil violence prepare the ground for renewed conflict by locking countries into a 'conflict trap.'”

    From Dynamics and Logics of Civil War (2017) · cites this paper as Collier et al. (2003)

  • Several impacts of armed conflict involve factors that also increase the risk of conflict outbreak, reflecting endogenous conditions that jointly comprise a conflict trap.

    “Several of these impacts involve factors that also increase the risk of conflict outbreak, reflecting endogenous conditions that jointly comprise a conflict trap (22).”

    From Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change (2021) · cites this paper as [22]

  • These plots jointly depict an endogenous relationship between underdevelopment and armed conflict that increases social vulnerability to climatic hazards, conflict sensitivity to climatic impacts, and vulnerability effects of armed conflict.

    “These plots jointly depict an endogenous relationship between underdevelopment and armed conflict (22,95) that increases social vulnerability to climatic hazards (Section 2.1), conflict sensitivity to climatic impacts (Section 2.2), and vulnerability effects of armed conflict (Section 2.3).”

    From Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change (2021) · cites this paper as [22]

  • Many civil wars flare up again within the first couple of years of termination; the best predictor of war for any given country is that the country was engaged in war the previous year.

    “Many civil wars flare up again within the first couple of years of termination, to the extent that the best predictor of war for any given country is that the country was engaged in war the previous year (22,24).”

    From Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change (2021) · cites this paper as [22]

  • Actors with incentives to initiate violence find conditions more conducive to radicalization and mobilization in poor, post-conflict societies.

    “actors who have incentives to initiate violence will find the conditions more conducive to radicalization and mobilization in poor, post-conflict societies (22,185).”

    From Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change (2021) · cites this paper as [22]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collier, P., Elliot, V. L., Hegre, H., Hoeffler, A., Reynal-Querol, M., & Sambanis, N.
ORCID
Venue
PsycEXTRA Dataset
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2003
DOI
10.1037/e504012013-001
OpenAlex
W2133462023
Cited by
2,431
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 125 · 2020: 136 · 2019: 138 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 112 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 121 · 2014: 122 · 2013: 99 · 2012: 107
Type
dataset
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
PsycEXTRA Dataset (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • Agence Française de Développement
  • Consortium pour la recherche économique en Afrique
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Natural Resources and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
Keywords
conflict trap, civil war, development policy, conflict duration, Kimberley Process, Khmer Rouge, marginalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review