Cited by 40Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders

Monocytosis Is a Biomarker of Severity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Analysis of a 6-Year Prospective Natural History Registry

Anderson, Alyce, Cherfane, Cynthia, Click, Benjamin, Ramos-Rivers, Claudia, Koutroubakis, Ioannis E, Hashash, Jana G, Babichenko, Dmitriy, Tang, Gong +7 more·2022·Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Abstract

Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with alterations of the innate and adaptive immune systems. Monocytes respond to inflammation and infection, yet the relationship between monocytosis and IBD severity is not fully understood. We aimed to characterize the prevalence of monocytosis in IBD and the association between monocytosis and disease severity and IBD-related health care utilization. Methods We used a multiyear, prospectively collected natural history registry to compare patients with IBD with monocytosis to those without monocytosis, among all patients and by disease type. Results A total of 1290 patients with IBD (64.1% with Crohn disease; 35.9% with ulcerative colitis) were included (mean age 46.4 years; 52.6% female). Monocytosis was found in 399 (30.9%) of patients with IBD (29.3% with Crohn disease; 33.9% with ulcerative colitis). Monocytosis was significantly associated with abnormal C-reactive protein level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, anemia, worse quality of life, active disease, and increased exposure to biologics (all P Conclusions Patients with IBD with monocytosis, regardless of disease type, are at increased risk for worse clinical outcomes, hospitalization, surgery, and ED use. Peripheral monocytosis may represent a routinely available biomarker of a distinct subgroup with severe disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ibd/izab031

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, A., Cherfane, C., Click, B., Ramos-Rivers, C., Koutroubakis, I. E., Hashash, J. G., Babichenko, D., Tang, G., Dunn, M., Barrie, A., Proksell, S., Dueker, J., Johnston, E., Schwartz, M., & Binion, D. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania , USA
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Binion, David G
Venue
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Published
2021-03-09
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
70-78
ISSN
  • 1078-0998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4844
OpenAlex
W4206492426
Cited by
40
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (TL1TR001858, W81XWH-11-2-0133)
  • U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (W81XWH-17-1-0556)
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (TL1TR001858)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders
Keywords
monocytosis, inflammatory bowel disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review