The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Natural Selection of Optimal Reproductive Tactics
Abstract
Acting through differential reproductive success, natural selection has produced a great diversity of existing reproductive tactics, each of which presumably corresponds to a local optimum that maximizes an individual organism's lifetime reproductive success in its particular environment. A body of theory on so-called reproductive “strategies” has yet to be adequately related to an independent theoretical framework on optimal foraging tactics. Some of the possible interactions and constraints between an animal's input of matter and energy via foraging and its output in offspring using these same materials are briefly considered. For example, storage and utilization of lipids allow an organism to gather and sequester matter and energy during a period that is not suitable for successful reproduction, but enable the organism to expend those materials at a later, more satisfactory time. Such interactions between foraging and reproduction lead to a sort of temporal integration, which greatly complicates estimation of reproductive effort (current investment in seed, eggs, or progeny) in variable environments. An optimal reproductive tactic maximizes an individual's reproductive value (the sum of all present plus the expected probable number of all future offspring) at every age. Reproductive effort should vary inversely with residual reproductive value (expectation of future offspring); moreover, the precise form of the trade-off between present offspring versus future progeny, which is itself sensitive to a multitude of environmental influences including resource availability and the immediate environmental conditions for reproduction and survival, dictates the optimal tactic at any given age. Simple graphical models of optimal reproductive tactics are presented and discussed. Finally, some promising directions for future work, as well as certain potential difficulties, are noted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment
MacArthur, R. H., & Pianka, E. R. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282454 · Cited by 4,593
Self-citationPleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence
Williams, G. C. (1957) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2406060 · Cited by 1,912
Cited by
BERNARDO, J. (1996) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/36.2.216 · Cited by 746
?Costs? of reproduction in reptiles
Shine, R. (1980) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00346972 · Cited by 687
The Reproductive Ecology of the House Mouse
Bronson, F. H. (1979) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/411295 · Cited by 611
Wasser, S. K., & Barash, D. P. (1983) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/413545 · Cited by 548
THE COST OF REPRODUCTION – A PHYSIOLOGICAL APPROACH
CALOW, P. (1979) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1979.tb00866.x · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- PIANKA, E. R.
- Venue
- American Zoologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1976-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 775-784
- ISSN
- 0003-1569 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012779244
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural Selection of Optimal Reproductive Tactics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icb/16.4.775
- The paper
- PIANKA, E. R. (1976). Natural Selection of Optimal Reproductive Tactics. American Zoologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/16.4.775
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.