The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Community Organization Among Neotropical Nectar-Feeding Birds
Abstract
Assemblages of neotropical hummingbirds are organized according to parameters of available resources and morphological-behavioral attributes of particular hummingbird species. We distinguish five types of flowers relative to hummingbird foraging, and we define six community roles for hummingbirds in exploitation of various flower types. These roles are: high-reward trapliners, which visit but do not defend nectar-rich flowers with long corollas; territorialists, which defend dense clumps of somewhat shorter flowers; lowreward trapliners, which forage among a variety of dispersed or nectar-poor flowers; territory-parasites of two types (large marauders and small filchers); and generalists, which follow shifting foraging patterns among various resources. Simple communities on islands usually contain one species of low-reward trapliner or generalist and one territorial species, and sometimes support one high-reward trapliner; often these species are sexuallydimorphic. More complex mainland communities support varying numbers of species in different roles, depending on the relative importance and constancy of different flower types. High-reward trapliners are particularly important in forest under-stories, while forest canopies and open habitats support large numbers of shorter-billed, mobile birds filling the other five roles. We conclude by pointing out the many parallels that exist with other consumer groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Levey, D. J., & Stiles, F. G. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285421 · Cited by 394
The Production of Dilute Nectars by Hummingbird and Honeyeater Flowers
Pyke, G. H., & Waser, N. M. (1981) · Biotropica · doi:10.2307/2387804 · Cited by 278
The ecological and evolutionary interface of hummingbird flight physiology
Altshuler, D. L., & Dudley, R. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.205.16.2325 · Cited by 135
Elevation and the Morphology, Flight Energetics, and Foraging Ecology of Tropical Hummingbirds
Feinsinger, P., Colwell, R. K., Terborgh, J., & Chaplin, S. B. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283408 · Cited by 119
Self-citationWild, free-living hummingbirds can learn what happened, where and in which context
Jelbert, S. A., Hurly, T. A., Marshall, R. E. S., & Healy, S. D. (2014) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.12.028 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- FEINSINGER, P., & COLWELL, R. K.
- Venue
- American Zoologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1978-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 779-795
- ISSN
- 0003-1569 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987906315
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community Organization Among Neotropical Nectar-Feeding Birds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icb/18.4.779
- The paper
- FEINSINGER, P., & COLWELL, R. K. (1978). Community Organization Among Neotropical Nectar-Feeding Birds. American Zoologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/18.4.779
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.