The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Definition and Recognition of Biological Adaptation
Abstract
Biological adaptation is a property of phenotypic features of organisms relative to selection demands of the environment. Adaptive features are ones having properties of form and function which permit the organism to maintain successfully the synerg between a biological role of that feature and a stated selection force. The degree of goodness of the adaptation can be measured by means of the amount of energy needed to maintain the synerg with less energy indicating better adaptation. Adaptation does not apply to a close fit between different features or between the form and function of a feature or to the mutual interactions between features of a structural network. The state of being adapted is independent of the process of becoming adapted as adaptations need not evolve under the control of selection forces to which they are now adapted. Selection is here considered as the demands placed on the organism by the environment with which the organism must cope to continue surviving as an individual. Adapted features have been judged using three methods—the comparative the correlative and the synthetic—of which only the last is valid. The synthetic method requires study of the forms and functions of the feature in the laboratory and of the biological roles of the feature and the selection demands of the environment in the field. It is suggested that the best approach for the study of adaptations is a team effort with constant feedback between the laboratory and field phases of study. It is urged that attention be given to the development of an ecological morphology to supplement functional morphology and provide the necessary foundation for proper elucidation of biological adaptations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form
Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s0094837300004310 · Cited by 5,136
Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change
Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., & Feldman, M. W. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00002417 · Cited by 1,103
Neuropeptide repertoire and 3D anatomy of the ctenophore nervous system
Sachkova, M. Y., Nordmann, E.-L., Soto-Àngel, J. J., Meeda, Y., Górski, B., Naumann, B., Dondorp, D., Chatzigeorgiou, M., Kittelmann, M., & Burkhardt, P. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.005 · Cited by 95
The Role of Adaptation in Archaeological Explanation
O'Brien, M. J., & Holland, T. D. (1992) · American Antiquity · doi:10.2307/2694834 · Cited by 97
Livezey, B. C. (2003) · Ornithological Monographs · doi:10.2307/40168337 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- BOCK, W. J.
- Venue
- American Zoologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1980-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 217-227
- ISSN
- 0003-1569 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979141927
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Definition and Recognition of Biological Adaptation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icb/20.1.217
- The paper
- BOCK, W. J. (1980). The Definition and Recognition of Biological Adaptation. American Zoologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/20.1.217
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.