The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Viviparity: The Maternal-Fetal Relationship in Fishes
Abstract
SYNOPSIS. Viviparity in the vertebrate line first makes its evolutionary appearance among fishes. It has independently evolved in a number of divergent piscine lineages. The 54 families of extant fishes that bear living young include 40 families of chondrichthyans (sharks and rays), one montypic family of coelacanths (Latimeria), and 13 families of teleosts. There is fossil evidence for viviparity in holocephalans and chondrosteans. Viviparity predominates among sharks and rays (40 families, 99 genera, 420 species) but is less widespread among teleosts (13 families, 122 genera, 510 species). Following an historical introduction, the organization of the female reproductive system, sites of gestation, developmental sequences and superfetation are considered. The evolution of viviparity establishes specialized maternal-fetal relationships, viz., 1) developmental, 2) morphological, 3) trophic, 4) osmoregulatory, 5) respiratory, 6) endocrinological, and 7) immunological. While the latter four categories are briefly noted the major emphasis is on the trophic relationship and its morphological and developmental basis. First, a general overview is presented and then the maternal-fetal trophic relationships in each of the major groups of fishes are systematically reviewed. Pertinent anatomical, histological, ultrastructural, developmental, physiological, and biochemical studies are considered. Viviparous fishes are either lecithotrophic, i.e., exclusively yolk dependent, or matrotrophic, i.e., in receipt of a continuous supply of maternal nutrients during gestation. Nutrient transfer is accomplished by 1) oophagy and adelphophagy, 2) placental analogues, and 3) the yolk sac placenta. Placental analogues include: external epithelial absorptive surfaces, e.g., skin, fins, gills; trophonemata, modifications of the uterine epithelia for the secretion of histotrophe or “uterine milk”; branchial placentae, close apposition between gill epithelia and either uterine or ovarian epithelial villi; the yolk sac; pericardial amnion and chorion; follicular pseudoplacenta, close apposition between follicle cells and embryonic absorptive epithelia; hypertrophied gut; and trophotaeniae, external rosette or ribbon-like projections of the embryonic gut. Among chondrichthyans, the yolk sac placenta (840–1,050%), trophonematal secretion and embryonic absorbtion of histotrophe (1,680–4,900%) and oophagy and adelphophagy (1.2 × 106%) are the most efficient methods of nutrient transfer. Among teleosts, the follicular pseudoplacenta (1,800–3,900%), trophotaeniae (8,400%) and absorption of ovarian histotrophe through surface epithelia and a hypertrophied gut (1,100–34,000%) are the most efficient. These values stand in contrast to the 30%40% loss of dry weight characteristic of oviparous fishes and viviparous lecithotrophes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 · Cited by 7,770
(1977) · Cited by 4,052
Cellular and Dynamic Aspects of Oocyte Growth in Teleosts
WALLACE, R. A., & SELMAN, K. (1981) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/21.2.325 · Cited by 1,261
Reproductive Guilds of Fishes: A Proposal and Definition
Balon, E. K. (1975) · Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada · doi:10.1139/f75-110 · Cited by 1,010
Grassé, P.-P., Bourdelle, E., Bourlière, F., & Dekeyser, P. L. (1955) · Cited by 933
Medawar, P. B., & Medawar, P. B. (1953) · Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology · Cited by 833
BIOCHEMISTRY AND MORPHOGENESIS
(1943) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1943.tb44800.x · Cited by 766
Phyletic Relationships of Living Sharks and Rays
Compagno, L. J. V. (1977) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/17.2.303 · Cited by 545
Cellular Organization of the Testis and Spermatogenesis in Fishes
GRIER, H. J. (1981) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/21.2.345 · Cited by 533
PACKARD, G. C., TRACY, C. R., & ROTH, J. J. (1977) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1977.tb01346.x · Cited by 377
Cited by
A Standardized Terminology for Describing Reproductive Development in Fishes
Brown-Peterson, N. J., Wyanski, D. M., Saborido-Rey, F., Macewicz, B. J., & Lowerre-Barbieri, S. K. (2011) · Marine and Coastal Fisheries · doi:10.1080/19425120.2011.555724 · Cited by 1,187
Maltepe, E., & Fisher, S. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100814-125620 · Cited by 592
Pratt, H. L., & Carrier, J. C. (2001) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1023/a:1007656126281 · Cited by 345
The importance of habitat and life history to extinction risk in sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras
García, V. B., Lucifora, L. O., & Myers, R. A. (2008) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1295 · Cited by 329
Resource allocation in yolk-feeding fish
Kamler, E. (2008) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-007-9070-x · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- WOURMS, J. P.
- Venue
- American Zoologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1981-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 473-515
- ISSN
- 0003-1569 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062820559
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 4.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Viviparity: The Maternal-Fetal Relationship in Fishes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icb/21.2.473
- The paper
- WOURMS, J. P. (1981). Viviparity: The Maternal-Fetal Relationship in Fishes. American Zoologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/21.2.473
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.