The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Energy Allocation in Mammalian Reproduction
Abstract
SYNOPSIS. On behavioral, hormonal, and physiological grounds, mammalian reproduction can be compartmentalized into the following continuous sequence of events: mating (courtship, estrous), gestation, parturition, lactation, post-lactational parental care, and maternal recovery. We point out that comparing the relative allocation of energy for these events across mammals is difficult because of life history variability (e.g., litter size, birth weight), allometry, phylogeny, and individual variation. We review the empirical and theoretical literature on each of these events with respect to: different methodologies in measuring energy use;broad patterns of energy consumption across diverse mammalian taxa; and, identification of particular reproductive characteristics (e.g., birthing, parental care) which may be costly but have yet to receive energetic measurements. Although most studies have consideredgestation and lactation the critical reproductive events for energy expenditure, variation in these events is substantial and almost certainly is a function of relative allocation of time togestation vs. lactation as well as the presumed energetic costs of mating, birthing and parental care. In addition, repeated observations show that behavioral compensation is an extremely important strategy for minimizing energy requirements during reproduction. From this review, we argue that more complete analyses will come from (1) incorporating energetic measurements in studies of mammalian behavior and (2) including mechanisms of behavioral compensation into physiological studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Reproductive Ecology of the House Mouse
Bronson, F. H. (1979) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/411295 · Cited by 611
Cited by
STRESS IN FREE-RANGING MAMMALS: INTEGRATING PHYSIOLOGY, ECOLOGY, AND NATURAL HISTORY
Reeder, D. M., & Kramer, K. M. (2005) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1644/bhe-003.1 · Cited by 469
Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals
Stockley, P., & Bro-Jørgensen, J. (2011) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00149.x · Cited by 448
Lactobacilli Dominance and Vaginal pH: Why Is the Human Vaginal Microbiome Unique?
Miller, E. A., Beasley, D. E., Dunn, R. R., & Archie, E. A. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01936 · Cited by 401
Energetics of Pregnancy and Lactation in Freeranging Little Brown Bats (Myotis lucifugus)
Kurta, A., Bell, G. P., Nagy, K. A., & Kunz, T. H. (1989) · Physiological Zoology · doi:10.1086/physzool.62.3.30157928 · Cited by 371
CALORIE RESTRICTION AND AGING: A LIFE-HISTORY ANALYSIS
Shanley, D. P., & Kirkwood, T. B. L. (2000) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00076.x · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- GITTLEMAN, J. L., & THOMPSON, S. D.
- Venue
- American Zoologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 863-875
- ISSN
- 0003-1569 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071265782
- Cited by
- 903
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energy Allocation in Mammalian Reproduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icb/28.3.863
- The paper
- GITTLEMAN, J. L., & THOMPSON, S. D. (1988). Energy Allocation in Mammalian Reproduction. American Zoologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/28.3.863
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.