The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Potential Abiotic and Biotic Impacts of Zebra Mussels on the Inland Waters of North America
Abstract
SYNOPSIS. The expansion of zebra mussel distribution into inland waterways of North America portends significant abiotic and biotic changes mediated either directly or indirectly by Dreissena. Dreissena fouls a wide array of submerged substrates including rock surfaces, macrophytes, native molluscs, canal and dock walls, and watercraft and motor outdrives. Fouling of water intake pipes and associated installations can severely impair water delivery to hydroelectric, municipal and industrial users, necessitating proactive or reactive control measures. Mussels increase water clarity by removing suspended clay, silt, bacteria, phytoplankton, and small zooplankton. Clear water phases associated with Dreissena grazing may exceed in magnitude and duration those generated by zooplankton grazing. Enhanced water clarity increases light transmittance and growth of benthic plants. Some benthic invertebrates {e.g., unionid molluscs) are adversely affected by Dreissena, whereas others, including amphipod crustaceans, exploit structure associated with or wastes generated by zebra mussels. Dreissena is exploited by a host of predators, most notably waterfowl, fish and crayfish. Waterfowl predators that consume contaminated Dreissena have elevated concentrations of organic pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyl compounds. Invasion of shallow lakes and ponds by Dreissena may divert production and biomass from pelagic to benthic foodwebs, shifting ecosystems to an alternative state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown?
Simberloff, D., & Von Holle, B. (1999) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1023/a:1010086329619 · Cited by 2,231
Assessing the Effects of Climate Change on Aquatic Invasive Species
RAHEL, F. J., & OLDEN, J. D. (2008) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00950.x · Cited by 1,303
RUIZ, G. M., CARLTON, J. T., GROSHOLZ, E. D., & HINES, A. H. (1997) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/37.6.621 · Cited by 1,081
Alteration of Ecosystem Function by Zebra Mussels in Oneida Lake: Impacts on Submerged Macrophytes
Zhu, B., Fitzgerald, D. G., Mayer, C. M., Rudstam, L. G., & Mills, E. L. (2006) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-005-0049-y · Cited by 204
Prolonged Lag in Population Outbreak of an Invasive Mussel: A Shifting-Habitat Model
Rilov, G., Benayahu, Y., & Gasith, A. (2004) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1023/b:binv.0000034614.07427.96 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- MACISAAC, H. J.
- Venue
- American Zoologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 287-299
- ISSN
- 0003-1569 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100271325
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potential Abiotic and Biotic Impacts of Zebra Mussels on the Inland Waters of North America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icb/36.3.287
- The paper
- MACISAAC, H. J. (1996). Potential Abiotic and Biotic Impacts of Zebra Mussels on the Inland Waters of North America. American Zoologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/36.3.287
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.