The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Importance of Body Stiffness in Undulatory Propulsion
Abstract
During steady swimming in fish, the dynamic form taken by the axial undulatory wave may depend on the bending stiffness of the body. Previous studies have suggested the hypothesis that fish use their muscles to modulate body stiffness. In order to expand the theoretical and experimental tools available for testing this hypothesis, we explored the relationship between body stiffness, muscle activity, and undulatory waveform in the mechanical context of dynamically bending beams. We propose that fish minimize the mechanical cost of bending by increasing their body stiffness, which would allow them to tune their body's natural frequency to match the tailbeat frequency at a given swimming speed. A review of the literature reveals that the form of the undulatory wave, as measured by propulsive wavelength, is highly variable within species, a result which calls into question the use of propulsive wavelength as a species-specific indicator of swimming mode. At the same time, the smallest wavelength within a species is inversely proportional to the number of vertebrae across taxa (r2 = 0.21). In order to determine if intact fish bodies are capable of increasing bending stiffness, we introduce a method for stimulating muscle in the body of a dead fish while it is being cyclically bent at physiological frequencies. The bending moment (N m) and angular displacement (radians) are measured during dynamic bending with and without muscle stimulation. Initial results from these whole body work loops demonstrate that largemouth bass possess the capability to increase body stiffness by using their muscles to generate negative mechanical work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
Cited by
Materials design principles of ancient fish armour
Bruet, B. J. F., Song, J., Boyce, M. C., & Ortiz, C. (2008) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2231 · Cited by 447
Mechanics and Control of Swimming: A Review
Colgate, J. E., & Lynch, K. M. (2004) · IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering · doi:10.1109/joe.2004.833208 · Cited by 428
Zhu, J., White, C., Wainwright, D. K., Di Santo, V., Lauder, G. V., & Bart-Smith, H. (2019) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aax4615 · Cited by 353
Muscle fiber angle, segment bulging and architectural gear ratio in segmented musculature
Brainerd, E. L., & Azizi, E. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.01770 · Cited by 121
Viscoelastic properties of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans , a self-similar, shear-thinning worm
Backholm, M., Ryu, W. S., & Dalnoki-Veress, K. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1219965110 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- LONG, J. H., & NIPPER, K. S.
- Venue
- American Zoologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 678-694
- ISSN
- 0003-1569 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026853446
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Importance of Body Stiffness in Undulatory Propulsion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icb/36.6.678
- The paper
- LONG, J. H., & NIPPER, K. S. (1996). The Importance of Body Stiffness in Undulatory Propulsion. American Zoologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/36.6.678
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.