The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Song Learning, Early Nutrition and Sexual Selection in Songbirds
Abstract
SYNOPSIS. The developmental processes through which songbirds acquire their species—typical songs have been well—studied from a proximate perspective, but less attention has been given to the ultimate question of why birds learn to sing. We present a new hypothesis for the adaptive significance of song learning in songbirds, suggesting that this specialized form of vocal development provides an indicator mechanism by which females can accurately assess the quality of potential mates. This hypothesis expands on the established idea that song can provide an indicator of male quality, but it explicitly links the variation in song expression that females use to choose mates to the developmental processes through which song is acquired. How well a male sings—reflected in repertoire size or in other learned features of a male's singing behavior—provides an honest indicator of quality because the timing of song learning and, more importantly, the timing of the development of brain structures mediating learning corresponds to a period in development during which young songbirds are most likely to undergo nutritional stress. This correspondence means that song learning can provide a sensitive indicator of early developmental history in general, which in turn reflects various aspects of the phenotypic and genotypic quality of a potential mate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
Nottebohm, F., Nottebohm, M. E., & Crane, L. (1986) · Behavioral and Neural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0163-1047(86)90485-1 · Cited by 352
Cited by
S., N., W., S., & S., P. (2002) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00359-002-0361-3 · Cited by 481
Song Function and the Evolution of Female Preferences: Why Birds Sing, Why Brains Matter
NOWICKI, S., & SEARCY, W. A. (2004) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1298.012 · Cited by 230
Self-citationSexual selection and human life history
Geary, D. C. (2003) · Advances in Child Development and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-2407(02)80039-8 · Cited by 136
The evolution of vocal learning
Nowicki, S., & Searcy, W. A. (2014) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2014.06.007 · Cited by 134
Self-citationBrumm, H., Zollinger, S. A., & Slater, P. J. B. (2009) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0749-y · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- NOWICKI, S., PETERS, S., & PODOS, J.
- Venue
- American Zoologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 179-190
- ISSN
- 0003-1569 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170946309
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Song Learning, Early Nutrition and Sexual Selection in Songbirds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icb/38.1.179
- The paper
- NOWICKI, S., PETERS, S., & PODOS, J. (1998). Song Learning, Early Nutrition and Sexual Selection in Songbirds. American Zoologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/38.1.179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.