The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stress in Fishes: A Diversity of Responses with Particular Reference to Changes in Circulating Corticosteroids
Abstract
Physical, chemical and perceived stressors can all evoke non-specific responses in fish, which are considered adaptive to enable the fish to cope with the disturbance and maintain its homeostatic state. If the stressor is overly severe or long-lasting to the point that the fish is not capable of regaining homeostasis, then the responses themselves may become maladaptive and threaten the fish's health and well-being. Physiological responses to stress are grouped as primary, which include endocrine changes such as in measurable levels of circulating catecholamines and corticosteroids, and secondary, which include changes in features related to metabolism, hydromineral balance, and cardiovascular, respiratory and immune functions. In some instances, the endocrine responses are directly responsible for these secondary responses resulting in changes in concentration of blood constituents, including metabolites and major ions, and, at the cellular level, the expression of heat-shock or stress proteins. Tertiary or whole-animal changes in performance, such as in growth, disease resistance and behavior, can result from the primary and secondary responses and possibly affect survivorship.Fishes display a wide variation in their physiological responses to stress, which is clearly evident in the plasma corticosteroid changes, chiefly cortisol in actinopterygian fishes, that occur following a stressful event. The characteristic elevation in circulating cortisol during the first hour after an acute disturbance can vary by more than two orders of magnitude among species and genetic history appears to account for much of this interspecific variation. An appreciation of the factors that affect the magnitude, duration and recovery of cortisol and other physiological changes caused by stress in fishes is important for proper interpretation of experimental data and design of effective biological monitoring programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wendelaar Bonga, S. E. (1997) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1997.77.3.591 · Cited by 4,188
Cited by
Stress and the welfare of cultured fish
Conte, F. S. (2004) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.02.003 · Cited by 517
Antibiotics in Aquaculture – Use, Abuse and Alternatives
Romero, J., Gloria, C., & Navarrete, P. (2012) · Health and Environment in Aquaculture · doi:10.5772/28157 · Cited by 489
A comparative and evolutionary approach to oxidative stress in fish: A review
Birnie‐Gauvin, K., Costantini, D., Cooke, S. J., & Willmore, W. G. (2017) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12215 · Cited by 478
Sundh, H., Kvamme, B., Fridell, F., Olsen, R., Ellis, T., Taranger, G., & Sundell, K. (2010) · BMC Physiology · doi:10.1186/1472-6793-10-22 · Cited by 104
Jeffrey, J. D., Hasler, C. T., Chapman, J. M., Cooke, S. J., & Suski, C. D. (2015) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icv022 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Barton, B. A.
- Venue
- Integrative and Comparative Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 517-525
- ISSN
- 1540-7063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7023
- OpenAlex
- W2099445531
- Cited by
- 2,511
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stress in Fishes: A Diversity of Responses with Particular Reference to Changes in Circulating Corticosteroids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icb/42.3.517
- The paper
- Barton, B. A. (2002). Stress in Fishes: A Diversity of Responses with Particular Reference to Changes in Circulating Corticosteroids. Integrative and Comparative Biology. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/42.3.517
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.