Structural Design and Biomechanics of Friction-Based Releasable Attachment Devices in Insects
Abstract
Design of attachment devices in insects varies enormously in relation to different functional loads. Many systems, located on different parts of the body, involve surfaces with particular frictional properties. Such systems evolved to attach parts of the body to each other, or to attach an insect to the substratum by providing fast and reversible attachment/detachment. Among these systems, there are some that deal with predefined surfaces, and others, in which one surface remains unpredictable. The first type of system occurs, for example, in wing-locking devices and head-arresting systems and is called probabilistic fasteners. The second type is mainly represented by insect attachment pads of two alternative designs: hairy and smooth. The relationship between surface patterns and/or mechanical properties of materials of contact pairs results in two main working principles of the frictional devices: mechanical interlocking, or maximization of the contact area. We give an overview of the functional design of two main groups of friction-based attachment devices in insects: probabilistic fasteners and attachment pads.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The global organization of the fly's nervous system resembles that of vertebrates yet it can be examined at the synaptic level using connectomes of the whole brain and VNC.
“The global organization of the fly's nervous system resembles that of vertebrates 35,36 yet it can be examined at the synaptic level using connectomes-synapse-resolution neural wiring diagrams-of the whole brain 37 and VNC 38,39 .”
From NeuroMechFly v2: simulating embodied sensorimotor control in adult Drosophila (2024) · cites this paper as [37]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ha, M., Lim, S., Park, J., Um, D., Lee, Y., & Ko, H. (2015) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201500453 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Drechsler, P., & Federle, W. (2006) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-006-0150-5 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Chun, C., Biswas, T., & Bhandawat, V. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.65878 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
NeuroMechFly v2: simulating embodied sensorimotor control in adult Drosophila
Wang-Chen, S., Stimpfling, V. A., Lam, T. K. C., Özdil, P. G., Genoud, L., Hurtak, F., & Ramdya, P. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02497-y · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“Although liftoff mechanisms are known for some insects 36,37 , they are not known for D. melanogaster .”
- Authors
- Gorb, S. N.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Gorb, S. N.
- ORCID
- Gorb, S. N.
- Venue
- Integrative and Comparative Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1127-1139
- ISSN
- 1540-7063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7023
- OpenAlex
- W2145624080
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Integrative and Comparative Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
- Keywords
- mechanical interlocking, surface patterns, biomechanics, structural design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review