CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 214Adhesion, Friction, and Surface InteractionsRobotic Locomotion and ControlNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biomechanics of smooth adhesive pads in insects: influence of tarsal secretion on attachment performance

Drechsler, Patrick, Federle, Walter·2006·Journal of Comparative Physiology A
DOI 10.1007/s00359-006-0150-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Many insects possess smooth adhesive pads on their legs, which adhere by thin films of a two-phasic secretion. To understand the function of such fluid-based adhesive systems, we simultaneously measured adhesion, friction and contact area in single pads of stick insects (Carausius morosus). Shear stress was largely independent of normal force and increased with velocity, seemingly consistent with the viscosity-effect of a continuous fluid film. However, measurements of the remaining force 2 min after a sliding movement show that adhesive pads can sustain considerable static friction. Repeated sliding movements and multiple consecutive pull-offs to deplete adhesive secretion showed that on a smooth surface, friction and adhesion strongly increased with decreasing amount of fluid. In contrast, pull-off forces significantly decreased on a rough substrate. Thus, the secretion does not generally increase attachment but does so only on rough substrates, where it helps to maximize contact area. When slides were repeated at one position so that secretion could accumulate, sliding shear stress decreased but static friction remained clearly present. This suggests that static friction which is biologically important to prevent sliding is based on non-Newtonian properties of the adhesive emulsion rather than on a direct contact between the cuticle and the substrate.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00359-006-0150-5

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The adult fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, is an ideal organism for modeling biological hierarchical controller in its entirety.

    “The adult fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster , is an ideal organism for modeling biological hierarchical controller in its entirety.”

    From NeuroMechFly v2: simulating embodied sensorimotor control in adult Drosophila (2024) · cites this paper as [35]

  • The global organization of the fly's nervous system resembles that of vertebrates yet it can be examined at the synaptic level using connectomes of the whole brain and VNC.

    “The global organization of the fly's nervous system resembles that of vertebrates 35,36 yet it can be examined at the synaptic level using connectomes-synapse-resolution neural wiring diagrams-of the whole brain 37 and VNC 38,39 .”

    From NeuroMechFly v2: simulating embodied sensorimotor control in adult Drosophila (2024) · cites this paper as [35]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Drechsler, P., & Federle, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Federle, Walter
ORCID
Federle, Walter
Venue
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2006-07-12
Volume
192
Issue
11
Pages
1213-1222
ISSN
  • 0340-7594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1351
DOI
10.1007/s00359-006-0150-5
OpenAlex
W1967629986
Cited by
214
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
FWCI
12.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Comparative Physiology A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/E004156/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
stick insects, Carausius morosus, adhesion, static friction, shear stress, contact area, pull-off force, non-Newtonian fluids, surface roughness
MeSH terms
Adhesiveness, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Extremities, Insecta, Locomotion, Bodily Secretions, Surface Properties, Friction, Insect Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review