Authentic Research in the Classroom Increases Appreciation for Plants in Undergraduate Biology Students
Abstract
Synopsis: Engaging students in authentic research increases student knowledge, develops STEM skills, such as data analysis and scientific communication, and builds community. Creating authentic research opportunities in plant biology might be particularly crucial in addressing plant awareness disparity (PAD) (formerly known as plant blindness), producing graduates with botanical literacy, and preparing students for plant-focused careers. Our consortium created four CUREs (course-based undergraduate research experiences) focused on dual themes of plant biology and global change, designed to be utilized by early and late-career undergraduates across a variety of educational settings. We implemented these CURES for four semesters, in a total of 15 courses, at four institutions. Pre- and post-course assessments used the Affective Elements of Science Learning Questionnaire and parts of a “plant blindness” instrument to quantify changes in scientific self-efficacy, science values, scientific identity, and plant awareness or knowledge. The qualitative assessment also queried self-efficacy, science values, and scientific identity. Data revealed significant and positive shifts in awareness of and interest in plants across institutions. However, quantitative gains in self-efficacy and scientific identity were only found at two of four institutions tested. This project demonstrates that implementing plant CUREs can produce affective and cognitive gains across institutional types and course levels. Focusing on real-world research questions that capture students’ imaginations and connect to their sense of place could create plant awareness while anchoring students in scientific identities. While simple interventions can alleviate PAD, implementing multiple CUREs per course, or focusing more on final CURE products, could promote larger and more consistent gains in student affect across institutions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Course-based undergraduate research experiences shift awareness and interest in plants.
“while course-based undergraduate research experiences shift awareness and interest in plants (Hiatt et al., 2021;Ward et al., 2014)”
From OTE Reconstructing the Assessment System of the Undergraduate Course “Plant Physiology” in the AI Era: A Framework for Authentic and AI-Resilient Task Design (2026) · cites this paper as Hiatt et al., 2021
Plant-science education research demonstrates that inquiry-rich, research-infused, and communication-centered approaches significantly improve knowledge, reasoning, writing, and disciplinary interest.
“Plant-science education research demonstrates that inquiry-rich, research-infused, and communication-centered approaches significantly improve knowledge, reasoning, writing, and disciplinary interest (Beckmann et al., 2015;Hiatt et al., 2021;Ward et al., 2014).”
From OTE Reconstructing the Assessment System of the Undergraduate Course “Plant Physiology” in the AI Era: A Framework for Authentic and AI-Resilient Task Design (2026) · cites this paper as Hiatt et al., 2021
Cites
Brownell, S. E., Hekmat-Scafe, D. S., Singla, V., Chandler Seawell, P., Conklin Imam, J. F., Eddy, S. L., Stearns, T., & Cyert, M. S. (2015) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.14-05-0092 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Peng, J. (2026) · World Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.22158/wjer.v13n2p127
- Authors
- Hiatt, A. C., Hove, A. A., Ward, J. R., Ventura, L., Neufeld, H. S., Boyd, A. E., Clarke, H. D., Horton, J. L., & Murrell, Z. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
- Warren Wilson College (US)
- University of North Carolina at Asheville (US)
- East Tennessee State University (US)
- Appalachian State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hove, Alisa A
- Venue
- Integrative and Comparative Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-05-29
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 969-980
- ISSN
- 1540-7063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7023
- OpenAlex
- W3165224823
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Integrative and Comparative Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Warren Wilson College Applied Learning Program and the National Science Foundation (NSF-DUE-IUSE-#1525063)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
- Keywords
- plant blindness, course-based undergraduate research experiences, authentic research, botany education, science identity, values in science, global change, undergraduate biology students, sense of place
- MeSH terms
- Biology, Botany, Communication, Curriculum, Humans, Plants, Research, Students, Universities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review