Cited by 289Science Education and PedagogyInnovative Teaching MethodsUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research

A High-Enrollment Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience Improves Student Conceptions of Scientific Thinking and Ability to Interpret Data

Open access
Brownell, Sara E., Hekmat-Scafe, Daria S., Singla, Veena, Chandler Seawell, Patricia, Conklin Imam, Jamie F., Eddy, Sarah L., Stearns, Tim, Cyert, Martha S.·2015·CBE—Life Sciences Education

Abstract

We present an innovative course-based undergraduate research experience curriculum focused on the characterization of single point mutations in p53, a tumor suppressor gene that is mutated in more than 50% of human cancers. This course is required of all introductory biology students, so all biology majors engage in a research project as part of their training. Using a set of open-ended written prompts, we found that the course shifts student conceptions of what it means to think like a scientist from novice to more expert-like. Students at the end of the course identified experimental repetition, data analysis, and collaboration as important elements of thinking like a scientist. Course exams revealed that students showed gains in their ability to analyze and interpret data. These data indicate that this course-embedded research experience has a positive impact on the development of students’ conceptions and practice of scientific thinking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1187/cbe.14-05-0092

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students experience cognitive gains from CUREs, including analyzing data, interpreting results, and increased content knowledge.

    “Students experience cognitive gains, including analyzing data, interpreting results, and increased content knowledge (6–10, 17, 18).”

    From Gains in Scientific Identity, Scientific Self-Efficacy, and Career Intent Distinguish Upper-Level CUREs from Traditional Experiences in the Classroom (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Discussion section, “Documented Learning Gains in Student Ability to Interpret Data,” reports improved ability to analyze data and draw conclusions from experiments. However, the Evaluation Methods section says the authors did not test content knowledge because it was not a course goal, so this paper does not establish that gain. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brownell, S. E., Hekmat-Scafe, D. S., Singla, V., Chandler Seawell, P., Conklin Imam, J. F., Eddy, S. L., Stearns, T., & Cyert, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • *Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5020
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Brownell, Sara E.
Venue
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2015-06
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
ar21
ISSN
1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1864678345
Cited by
287
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4
FWCI
95.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0941984)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Stanford Graduate School of Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
Keywords
course-based undergraduate research experiences, scientific thinking, student conceptions of science, data interpretation, p53 point mutations, tumor suppressor, research skills development
MeSH terms
Concept Formation, Curriculum, Female, Humans, Laboratories, Male, Research, Science, Statistics as Topic, Students, Thinking, Universities, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review