Cited by 39Morphological variations and asymmetryEvolution and Paleontology StudiesComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

The Future is Bright for Evolutionary Morphology and Biomechanics in the Era of Big Data

Muñoz, Martha M, Price, Samantha A·2019·Integrative and Comparative Biology

Abstract

In recent years, the fields of evolutionary biomechanics and morphology have developed into a deeply quantitative and integrative science, resulting in a much richer understanding of how structural relationships shape macroevolutionary patterns. This issue highlights new research at the conceptual and experimental cutting edge, with a special focus on applying big data approaches to classic questions in form–function evolution. As this issue illustrates, new technologies and analytical tools are facilitating the integration of biomechanics, functional morphology, and phylogenetic comparative methods to catalyze a new, more integrative discipline. Although we are at the cusp of the big data generation of organismal biology, the field is nonetheless still data-limited. This data bottleneck is primarily due to the rate-limiting steps of digitizing specimens, recording and tracking organismal movements, and extracting patterns from massive datasets. Automation and machine-learning approaches hold great promise to help data generation keep pace with ideas. As a final and important note, almost all the research presented in this issue relied on specimens—totaling the tens of thousands—provided by museum collections. Without collection, curation, and conservation of museum specimens, the future of the field is much less bright.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/icb/icz121

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muñoz, M. M., & Price, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Clemson University (US)
Corresponding author
Muñoz, Martha M
Venue
Integrative and Comparative Biology
Published
2019-06-28
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
599-603
ISSN
  • 1540-7063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7023
OpenAlex
W2955592992
Cited by
39
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Integrative and Comparative Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NSF (FELS ID1839250, DEB-1556953)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
evolutionary morphology, evolutionary biomechanics, macroevolution, phylogenetic comparative analysis, big data, museum specimens, digitization, machine learning, automation, data bottleneck, motion tracking
MeSH terms
Big Data, Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Biological Evolution, Invertebrates, Phylogeny, Vertebrates, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review