The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organizational Environments and Industry Exit: the Effects of Uncertainty, Munificence and Complexity
Abstract
Economists and organization theorists have asked which factors are linked to the rate at which firms exit an industry. Yet little research has linked exit rates to changes over time in the key dimensions which characterize an industry's environment. This study examines linkages between exit rates and changing levels of uncertainty, munificence and complexity in an industry. A longitudinal study of the American cement (1888–1980) and minicomputer (1958–1982) industries reveals that uncertainty is the key environmental dimension associated with organizational mortality. Controlling for ecological and macroeconomic conditions, exit rates are associated with uncertainty, but not complexity or munificence. The greater the uncertainty, the higher the exit rates. Two kinds of uncertainty create hazardous environmental conditions: unpredictable changes in demand and eras of ferment bounded by technological discontinuities and dominant designs. Our results indicate that while organizations can deal with different levels of economic munificence and complexity, uncertainty is a significantly more lethal characteristic of organizational environments. The results support Schumpeterian perspectives linking industry turnover to ‘waves of creative destruction’, but suggest more broadly that an organization's ability to cope with uncertainty is a key determinant of its life chances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. (2002) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094913 · Cited by 1,457
Pathak, S. D., Day, J. M., Nair, A., Sawaya, W. J., & Kristal, M. M. (2007) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00170.x · Cited by 530
Kristal, M. M., Huang, X., & Roth, A. V. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.12.002 · Cited by 489
Kapoor, R., & Agarwal, S. (2017) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1122 · Cited by 453
Reymen, I. M. M. J., Andries, P., Berends, H., Mauer, R., Stephan, U., & van Burg, E. (2015) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1201 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, P.
- Venue
- Industrial and Corporate Change
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-08-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 675-711
- ISSN
- 0960-6491 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3650
- OpenAlex
- W2030065414
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Environments and Industry Exit: the Effects of Uncertainty, Munificence and Complexity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icc/10.3.675
- The paper
- Anderson, P. (2001). Organizational Environments and Industry Exit: the Effects of Uncertainty, Munificence and Complexity. Industrial and Corporate Change. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.3.675
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.