The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature
Abstract
The literature on university entrepreneurship is rapidly expanding, in both the United States and Europe. Since the literature is also fairly fragmented, however, we submit that it is time to take stock of the current knowledge to provide directions for future research and guideposts for policy makers. To accomplish this, we present an unusually comprehensive and detailed literature analysis of the stream of research on university entrepreneurship, now encompassing 173 articles published in a variety of academic journals. Four major research streams emerge in this area of study: (i) entrepreneurial research university, (ii) productivity of technology transfer offices, (iii) new firm creation, and (iv) environmental context including networks of innovation. We inductively derive a framework describing the dynamic process of university entrepreneurship based on a synthesis of the literature. We submit that this framework is useful in guiding future research on this important, yet complex and under-researched topic. Copyright 2007 , Oxford University Press.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications*
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x · Cited by 3,154
Sine, W. D., Shane, S., & Gregorio, D. D. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.4.478.14416 · Cited by 330 · cited 3×
“Development stages have been defined with reference to start-up date (Clarysse and Moray, 2004), main business activities (Ndonzuau et al., 2002), and critical resources needed (Sine et al., 2003; Wright et al., 2004b).”
Background
Cited by
Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration
Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006 · Cited by 1,400
Wagner, M., Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E. G., & Fichter, K. (2021) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00280-4 · Cited by 160
Knowledge management in higher education: A literature review and further research avenues
Quarchioni, S., Paternostro, S., & Trovarelli, F. (2022) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1080/14778238.2020.1730717 · Cited by 131
Crossing the valley of death: Five underlying innovation processes
Ellwood, P., Williams, C., & Egan, J. (2022) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102162 · Cited by 126
Using the wayback machine to mine websites in the social sciences: A methodological resource
Arora, S. K., Li, Y., Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2016) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23503 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L.
- Venue
- Industrial and Corporate Change
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-07-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 691-791
- ISSN
- 0960-6491 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3650
- OpenAlex
- W2154333252
- Cited by
- 1,591
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 94.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.