The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The major threats to Atlantic salmon in Norway
Open accessAbstract
Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) is an economically and culturally important species. Norway has more than 400 watercourses with Atlantic salmon and supports a large proportion of the world’s wild Atlantic salmon. Atlantic salmon are structured into numerous genetically differentiated populations, and are therefore managed at the population level. Long-distance migrations between freshwater and ocean habitats expose Atlantic salmon to multiple threats, and a number of anthropogenic factors have contributed to the decline of Atlantic salmon during the last decades. Knowledge on the relative importance of the different anthropogenic factors is vital for prioritizing management measures. We developed a semi-quantitative 2D classification system to rank the different anthropogenic factors and used this to assess the major threats to Norwegian Atlantic salmon. Escaped farmed salmon and salmon lice from fish farms were identified as expanding population threats, with escaped farmed salmon being the largest current threat. These two factors affect populations to the extent that they may be critically endangered or lost, with a large likelihood of causing further reductions and losses in the future. The introduced parasite Gyrodactylus salaris, freshwater acidification, hydropower regulation and other habitat alterations were identified as stabilized population threats, which have contributed to populations becoming critically endangered or lost, but with a low likelihood of causing further loss. Other impacts were identified as less influential, either as stabilized or expanding factors that cause loss in terms of number of returning adults, but not to the extent that populations become threatened. Management based on population specific reference points (conservation limits) has reduced exploitation in Norway, and overexploitation was therefore no longer regarded an important impact factor. The classification system may be used as a template for ranking of anthropogenic impact factors in other countries and as a support for national and international conservation efforts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Impact of Climate Change on the World’s Marine Ecosystems
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., & Bruno, J. F. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1189930 · Cited by 2,939
The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines
Allendorf, F. W., Leary, R. F., Spruell, P., & Wenburg, J. K. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02290-x · Cited by 1,533
The behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon and trout
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0943 · Cited by 1,154 · cited 3×
“The ecological effects of the establishment of rainbow trout and pink salmon on Atlantic salmon are basically unknown (Quinn, 2005).”
InfluentialPropagule Pressure: A Null Model for Biological Invasions
Colautti, R. I., Grigorovich, I. A., & MacIsaac, H. J. (2006) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-005-3735-y · Cited by 966
A Standard Lexicon for Biodiversity Conservation: Unified Classifications of Threats and Actions
SALAFSKY, N., SALZER, D., STATTERSFIELD, A. J., HILTON‐TAYLOR, C., NEUGARTEN, R., BUTCHART, S. H. M., COLLEN, B., COX, N., MASTER, L. L., O'CONNOR, S., et al. (2008) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00937.x · Cited by 840
Effect of aluminium speciation on fish in dilute acidified waters
Driscoll, C. T., Baker, J. P., Bisogni, J. J., & Schofield, C. L. (1980) · Nature · doi:10.1038/284161a0 · Cited by 782
The Bioavailability and Toxicity of Aluminum in Aquatic Environments
Gensemer, R. W., & Playle, R. C. (1999) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389991259245 · Cited by 776
Jonsson, B., & Jonsson, N. (2009) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02380.x · Cited by 644
Salmon lice – impact on wild salmonids and salmon aquaculture
Torrissen, O., Jones, S., Asche, F., Guttormsen, A., Skilbrei, O. T., Nilsen, F., Horsberg, T. E., & Jackson, D. (2013) · Journal of Fish Diseases · doi:10.1111/jfd.12061 · Cited by 495
Ecology of Atlantic Salmon and Brown Trout: Habitat as a template for life histories
Jonsson, B., & Jonsson, N. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1189-1 · Cited by 494
Cited by
Beaver: Nature's ecosystem engineers
Brazier, R. E., Puttock, A., Graham, H. A., Auster, R. E., Davies, K. H., & Brown, C. M. L. (2021) · WIREs Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1494 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Forseth, T., Barlaup, B. T., Finstad, B., Fiske, P., Gjøsæter, H., Falkegård, M., Hindar, A., Mo, T. A., Rikardsen, A. H., Thorstad, E. B., Vøllestad, L. A., & Wennevik, V.
- Venue
- ICES Journal of Marine Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-03-03
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1496-1513
- ISSN
- 1054-3139 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9289
- OpenAlex
- W2593775995
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 22.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The major threats to Atlantic salmon in Norway. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icesjms/fsx020
- The paper
- Forseth, T., Barlaup, B. T., Finstad, B., Fiske, P., Gjøsæter, H., Falkegård, M., Hindar, A., Mo, T. A., Rikardsen, A. H., Thorstad, E. B., Vøllestad, L. A., & Wennevik, V. (2017). The major threats to Atlantic salmon in Norway. ICES Journal of Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.